TURNING NORMAL PEOPLE INTO RETARDS

The process is very easy. Place a normal, sane person into an environment that denies the development of all normal and healthy impulses and abilities. How do you get around that monstrosity?
FORMULA: Fundamental anchor: Evoke RELATIVITY.
It is all very easy.
Step A: Create a framework where people that act a certain way. All controlled factors: the incoming is controlled and the outgoing is guaranteed.
How? By application of certain techniques, suppression of certain factors and introduction of others
And how do you start? If you have a healthy community, you are facing a task. It is multi steptual. At first, you would need to win the people’s trust. Why? Because you will not convince them otherwise. So, you win the trust. Or you “win” the trust.
How?
For introduction of your ideas you could select people that have the people’s trust. You either do research or even go further, manufacture the people the people would trust at your selection.
How? Find out what speaks to people and create the spokesman between you and that community. Bribe, destroy opposition. But how do you “win” people’s trust? And what if what people trust and want is different from what you want and correspondingly, you want them to like and trust? Easy.
First, slowly deconstruct people’s natural self defense and let them mistrust their own intuition or even better, mind.
How?
At times brutally: by forcing public censure. At other times more subtly, through creating a system of rewards and punishments. It is best to work with uneducated, desperate or helpless people. You show them that there is a light at the end of the tunnel and if they do certain things, they will get the reward. If others, they will get punishment. So, first deconstruct, then, apply the system.
From here it is easy to understand: you could choose ANYTHING you’d like to deconstruct. It could be family values, love between the genders, connection to the land and people, one’s ethics. Even better, in order to deconstruct something normal and human and create a monstrosity, you would need to first turn people into dumb and thoughtless animals. No sane, thinking individual, with a soul and spirit and sense of right and wrong will allow or go along. Of course, their cowards and people whose sense of right and wrong is lacking, but these are understood to be not in need of the deconstruction. So, you deconstruct people’ self defense. You apply the system of censure + a system of rewards and punishments to those who would create the biggest resistance to your plans. You present all opposite to what people hold ideas, as good. You do not yet attack their ideas directly. You just introduce the idea that what the opposite is, is good. You do it through pleasant music, atmosphere, movies, commercials, poetry. For the best result you attack on all fronts: you penetrate every aspect of societal life. You provide subliminal messages, bombarding the psyche and avoiding the direct contact with the conscious mind. And if some people sense something and star objecting? Aha, but you are prepared here as well. You have knocked out the weapon from their hands already, but giving any conscious and self arising thought a bad name. If people do as much as SPEAK you present them as either “argumentative”, “bad”, “obnoxious”, “evil”, “against equality” or “racists”. The name will differ but what will be the same is the deliberate usage of propaganda and name calling. If you already won the people’s trust or know how to apply public censure (for example, any person with blue bag speaking on any subject gets a name “arguer” just because her predecessors with blue bags have been known to speak out. The subject does not matter because the public has a short attention span and reacts rather than thinks. Public reacts unconsciously, and if you create a right unconscious reaction to what people see, they will react as you’ve programmed them to. How do you manipulate unconscious reaction? By counterpoising something you want to give a bad name to with something that has a bad name already. So, first you counterpoise blue bags with something negative. Or even their act of speaking make appear funny or disgusting. The words do not matter, people will react to appearances. So then, after the act of speaking or the person of a blue bag has been paired with a negative image, you have created a negative image to the blue bags. And then? The new blue bag that comes in gets to be counterpoised with the now negatively presented blue bags. And her or his act of speaking appears to be either funny or disgusting. Congratulations! Moral reprobation of your opposition has been created. Easy? Like a recipe for a cupcake, one, two, three.)
You could do this with many things. Not only you could present something neutral as bad, or something good as bad, you could also present something bad as good. But again, for that you would need to
Introduce these ideas in a positive light and subliminally.
Destroy the opposition through applying negative imagery pairing to them.
Attack the act of objecting, protesting and rebelling by the same method: support the opposite (docility, sweetness, lack of resistance) and present the act as bad. Create an imagery and “supporters” (like a crook has the “supporters” when he tries to pass tricks on the public in the public place, to win people’s trust he brings in a few people of his own, disperses them in the crowd and has them act enthusiastically and in support of his ideas. Others “catch on” and join in, to their doom, in their stupidity and gullibility giving him their money, their time, their bodies, their minds, and sometimes, even, their souls)
Introduce the idea of “relativity” as the one and true reality. Anyone objecting will get treated: either they are “objectionable”, or a “blue bag”, or a simply in a way of public happiness and will (point A)
As you wield your new people, destroying their beliefs, morals and principles, introducing the ideas you want them to believe in, buying their trust, their support, preventing opposition from emanating by presenting the art of thinking and reasoning as bad( philosophy is horrible. You think too much. You are a philosopher? Are you a thinker? Ha ha, she is a thinker. Women that think too much and talk too much are not attractive. Etc. Etc. Etc) and an act of passive submission to fate as good (the introduction of Asian treats including romance of Asia, coupled with the magical enticement of Tao Te Jing allows to bring in the idea of submission to fate, acceptance of one’s “karma”, and upholdance of societal order as is (or as created through a double application of force and psychic and psychological manipulation by the powerful ones without conscience) helps to quickly convert large numbers of people into thoughtless and submissive live stock) you gain power. You have now made people believe into what you want them to believe and they cannot even estimate the beliefs you have made them to accept on their merits because you have taught them that to think, to use their own brain, is bad, They now believe that calm submission to the impulses coming from somewhere outside is normal, and to be expected. They also know that their “intuition” is right, and you encourage them since you have created that intuition and made them believe things that are convenient for you for them to believe in.
So, when a child is born, and has all the normal tendencies you so hard try to abolish, you immediately portray her or him as “retarded”. Or the child may simply go from a curious talented being to some stupid and dull animal, because you have closed all the channels for a normal, healthy development. How is it done? Through the same system of presenting desired processes and outcomes as “good” and undesired as “bad, by surpassing reason and discussion through subconscious and presenting as your way as THE WAY and the “proving” it with telling people to check it against their “intuition” – read a little before on how that “intuition” is created.
As as I found myself absolutely alone in my desire to speak and communicate and estimate the arguments being flung at me from all sides on their merits, I’ve realize I was the…bad guy! I wanted to ask why things were the way they were, but people responded in a non sequitur fashion: it all depend on perspective. They would not address the why but evaded any and all discussion by dwelling on the how. As to what they thought about x, y, z they did not know. They’ve skirted any questions with an attack on me: I was argumentative. The manipulators of the human consciousness, after having conquered the field of human life, went off and left the arrow, swords and spears laying around for the common folk to pick up and use. And so, “argumentative”, “aggressive” and such epithets are being flung in a state of semi-consciousness between people who have been taught that the best way to communicate is to shut up any and all opposition. The state of mind people have, I’ve observed in no way, shape or form reflective of the people under Democracy where the right and self assertion of the individual is mutually respected, but bespeaks of a Communist propagandistic state, where people threaten each other with currently accepted as “politically incorrect terms” if they are loosing an argument. The person has been made into an object, a foe, an enemy, not an individual human being with mind and will of her or his own. The people are literally fighting one another and are willing to forego all rules of propriety, decency and human dignity. They forbid each other to speak, have abolished ethics through claiming relativity to everything, and are angry and petty human beings who take revenge for a word spoken in full right of self assertion and self thought.