Do women really LOOOVE wearing heels, going through horrific tortures of waxing and plucking for hours, applying paints on their faces, as if their faces were worthless (patriarchy buys its love and sex, then deletes the people who remembered how it was done, and has a new brain washed generation gladly do their bidding. Devious Chimera.) and constantly obsessing over their waste (does it not sound like it easily could be another word, "waste" as is "garbage", "junk" lines?...The pursuit of thought on the subject that is junk..brain gets dirty and contaminated with junk...junk produces junk..perpetuation..can't have your cake and eat it too...what a stupid saying - why have cake and not eat it? Perhaps if I say: Evolution requires work, dedication and sacrifice, it will be better than this proverbial "cake" thing?..)) lines, as well as having a limit to how much they can develop a strength of their OWN physical body?! ..The fuck?!... Of course they do, THEY LOOOVEEE IT -that is, of course, if anyone would like to not eat fully every day (basically, constantly be hungry, frustrated and angry), to waste hours of good day hours in smelly “beauty” salons, soaking in bathtubs, being laid out horizontally to endure the pain of hot wax on one’s skin, to feel the metal of instruments against one’s cheek and eyebrows, to feel small shocks of sharp pain that accompanies hair removal, to then, after the torture is done, to watch one’s hands to remain PAINTED FUCK PAINTED HANDS and not to engage in sports, gardening or something similar fun lest the paint of the nails will come off, to wobble to and through while walking on the street on heels, to focus one each and every step one takes, to feel terrible backaches and develop spine disconnection towards only one’s thirties(!!), to be constantly in shame for one’s natural body function – menstruation,sacred, sacred mentstruation we endure so that you, fuckers, could have life and all; if one likes to be abhorred, if one likes being mocked and if one likes to be hated hated while pregnant (because suddenly the doll-like exterior a female is supposed to sport does not seem to be fitting nor is possible. Males don't forgive that, oh, they don't forgive you that, oh, they don't). Of course they like it like you would like to live about three hundred years ago in America, as a Black person who was a slave, whose minutes and hours were split between serving the massah and…serving the massah. A Black slave who had to wear what was given to him, eat what was given to him, behave with humility and with lowering one’s self and dignity lest a terrible retribution would follow. A Black slave who had to procreate at an order with the ordered male or female..A Black slave who'se babies were sold into slavery. A Black slave whose decisions did not matter, whose word did not count, whose desires were ignored and not even acknowledged. And how would a woman compare, you would ask, to a Black slave a few hundred years ago? Well, first I will compare the life of a woman to that of a life of a slave, and then I will compare a life of a woman to that of a life of an captured animal, serf, property, demon, object, angel and perhaps some elements in her life -both how it is treated by others and how it is in its essence, will manifest.
COMPARISON CHART:
Slaves have their dress decided upon by the master. If the order is not explicit, the choice of cloth is still dictated by master's preferences, slave's economic condition, and ever present fear to displease or surpass the master. Therefore, the choice of cloth of a slave is decided for him, either directly or indirectly. Moreover, this decision making goes further than to just affect the slave's cloth: her or his behavior changes to accompany the outward reflection of her or his status.
-Women have a dress code that is enforced by men. Heels, skirts, dresses, pink, ribbons, make up, accompanying behavior of giggles, stupid, non-sensical laughter, small step, ackward body movements.
Slaves do not dictate the payment for their work but receive whatever it is the master deems fit to give. It could be food, cloth, beatings or some money. Regardless of what it is that the master deems fit to give in exchange of slave's labor, the principle behind is the MASTER'S shot calling even on slave's wage and reward. Slaves have no bargaining power and settle for whatever it is that is given to them, simply because the slave's life is considered conditional and not unconditional like a life of a human being should be, and therefore, ANYTHING can be done to her or him, fit in with her or his master's wishes, desires or whims.
-Women have a salary limit that is determined by men. The salary limit is openly lower for WOMEN, even at the same jobs men do. Women can scream and object, but they are sill paid less. Women are expected to do more work, and always go a step extra. Women are often threatened with termination, rumour mongering and/or ostracism.
Slaves are a subject of and in master's conversation. Slaves can be name called, discussed with impunity, joked about and commented on even in the presence. Slaves are ALWAYS assumed to be lower, stupider or slower than any other "normal human being." Slaves have no recourse to justice to defend their good name because the name of a slave is both nonexistent and cannot be good, for a slave has neither a name nor honor, and moreover, the name of a slave is a property of a slave (using the term from physics), and the slave is a property of a slave owner, therefore, a slave's name is a property of a slave owner.
-Women are at all times, be it in the office, street and even political arena, subjected to comments and jokes about their appearances, sexual organs, and private lives. It is accepted as a matter of fact. Grocery stores, stores, public accomodations, streets and private houses have posters displaying women in a sexual or negative light, and mottos of mockery or abusive speech in the form of comments and advertisements are displayed. When women object, they are made fun off, and called more names. Women that make noise and object loose something: it could be their jobs, their mates or their society. From that I can derive that woman’s worth is naught.
Slaves are valued for what they could do, without incurring to much cost to the slave owner. Slaves are valued so long as they are healthy and hard working and productive. Slaves that get sick and are unable to perform, get either killed, beaten up and otherly punished, or simply banished onto the streets. Rather, into the woods.
-A woman is valued while she is young, fertile and sexually attractive. She must, at all times, not show signs of illness, tiredness and maintain the unnatural and crippling standards of "beauty" and work that goes with it (flirting, self-abnegation, self-erasure, self-negation, self-denial, self-humiliation, self-nonpreseservation, self-denigration. While she appears as a happily-well-adjusted mannequin, has no sexual life OF HER OWN (she maybe less or more sexually active, but it must be with the spirit of the times and with an issued permision of the slave master) nor displays real desires that could jeopardize the mannequinn look, she is allowed and tolerated. Older women, dissapear from the cities. Nobody knows where they go. Women that are not mannequinns lead a life that is worst than a dog's life: abuse, starvation, mocking. This moral and mental approbation is all enhanced by the fact women are taught no skills, their bodies are weakened and the help of the males is either meager, costs a lot or is not forthcoming. Left to left to die on the streets, children in adults (if you call a starved, abused and self-non aware body, a body of an "adult") they remind us of reality that really exists, for women...
A woman is non-existent as a human being. She can conceive of no dream, no self-fulfillment, no vision, no life without the long hand of the patriarchy reaching out of nowhere and smitting her: any desires she has, are analyzed for their “purity”, any comments she makes are reduced to no-meaning because they “came from a woman”, any ideas she floats are stolen and appropriated by some male in power or in favor... When she attempts to claim her authorship, she is either fired, mocked or removed. Not unlike 1984-style women who speak, dissaperar from political, social or private arena. Or much unrelated information -such as their sexual perfromance and the regularity of it and the nature of it (?..), as well as eating habits and clothing habits, is "revealed" to "shed light" upon the "cumprit.".........................................................
You are laughing? Women can loose their standing based on accusation of sexual promiscuity (read: having sex with more than one partner during a period of a life time) whereas for a man it will not affect his life, but bring his points up...(?...) Women can loose their standing in politics or business based on how well they “perform” as mothers and wives. A man cheats on his wife, abandons his children and still is a leading politician and businessman.
MAN:Men creates a suit and wears it.
WOMAN:Men creates a skirt and heels for a woman – woman wears it.
MAN:Men creates his own image and lives it.
WOMAN:Man creates an image of a woman, and woman lives it.
MAN:Man creates standards for himself, abolishes them and rationalizes any evil he does.
MAN: Men creates standards for women, enforces them and woe to those who violate them. MAN: Men marries and promises loyalty, then he cheats.
WOMAN:Woman marries and is required loyalty regardless of how her mate behaves.
MAN: Men is not punished for cheating.
WOMAN: Woman is punished for man’s cheating.
MAN: Man writes the history of his predecessors down.
MAN: Man writes false reports, hides evidence of women achievements, creates myths of lie and deceit and gives that to a woman. Man creates a "herstory" and gives it to woman. Womans must...
WOMAN: Woman, with the gun at her head takes the “herstory” and must repeat it, pass it on and create a false reality for other women to walk into.
MAN: Men teach their boys and love them.
MAN: Men leave their girls alone and to be come breeders and slaves. Women are taught to love boys and abandon girls.
MAN: Men create laws and break them. Men creates the law for a woman and watches she does not violate it to do the obligation of moral duty (Antigone).
MAN: Men speak philosophy and think, they say this is an office of a human being.
Men say philosophy is naught when a woman inquires and wants to participate.
MAN: Men praise each other for thinking and being smart.
WOMAN: Men chastise woman for thinking and being smart.
MAN: Men kill one another for sexual advances on one another: it is undignified to be reduced to a piece of ass from a station of a human being.
WOMAN: Men kill women for refusing their sexual advances and punish her for attempting to keep her station as a human being and not a piece of ass.
MAN: Men make schools for themselves and study.
They grow in knowledge and skill.
They say it is what a human being does.
They prove that we are Homo Sapiens.
WOMAN: Women are females of the species, therefore, Homo Sapiens as well.
Men convene a hundred or so years ago to discuss if women are human beings.
They decide they are not.
Some other place decides that they are.
How they go to defy their own concluded conclusion?
I don’t know.
WOMAN: Women sit passively and receive any decision.
Today they are human and vote.
Tomorrow they are sex slaves and bind their feet.
Today they are taught morality and right and wrong.
Tomorrow mother is pitched against her daughter, sister against sister and friend against friend. MAN: Men value friendship and sing songs about it.
Men teach one another the value of friendship.
WOMAN: Men teach women to fight one another over trinkets.
Men teach mother to be jealous of daughter, sister of sister and say women cannot be friends. When women prove them wrong, men say women are lesbians.
MAN: Men fuck one another because they are bored of slave women.
WOMAN: Women get together and find friendship among themselves, men leave everything and run after women to call them derogatory names, call them lesbians and enforce morality of church that they have abandoned while fucking one another.
Men take Christianity and Judaism and claim that these can accommodate gay men.
The FACT that there is a strict and SPECIFIC prohibition against homosexuality seems to disappear. There is not prohibiton against lesbianism. Men don't seem to see it. This lack of prohibion sheds much light on the nature of men and women, on the right and on the wrong.
MAN: Men get women involved and make them say: it’s ok.
WOMAN: Women in school are taught that math is bad for them,
women is school are taught that logic is bad for them,
women in school are taught that sports is bad for them,
women in school are taught that to argue is bad for them.
Women don’t know how to think, women are taught that history is bad for them.
Women, after 8,000 years have not learnt from all the precedence that has been.
Women do not know how to think, women think with limited experience, women get rallied.
Women are taught they are emotional creatures.
Women are taught they are mothers.
Women are taught man’s will is superior.
Women are taught man’s desire is superior.
Women know little, a good speech captures their emotions.
Women who don’t get captured get captured by public censure of other women who got caught by the emotions.
Women who want to think and not react, are accused of being inhuman and are mocked, ostracized and hurt.
Women go and support Church allowing homosexuals.
Women acts in a daze.
..She is semi-conscious, conscious enough to receive commands form the massah and not think or decide for herself.
An android.
A robot.
A slave.
A bionic carbon copy.
Women start waking up and demand to be let free.
MAN: Men give bad name to feminism, mix talented and smart women with dirt.
Men create another myth about women inferiority and “prove” it with biology.
Women know no numbers, women know no logic, women know no biology, women know not their own bodies, women don’t communicate with other women, women are brought up to trust the “experts” (aka the Boyz Club) and women believe themselves to be “proven”, yet again! – inferior.
Women calmly go back to sleep and to breed.
They attack women who are fully woken up and destroy them.
The order is back.
Time passes.
...........................................................................................................................................................................
A new fashion for a woman is invented.
Women from abroad are imported, better conditions are given to them here, and they are “asked” to parade new dress code and a more limited expression.
Women accept.
These women are advertised and sold. They become popular.
How can women deny? It? That?
-They don’t know how to think.
Remember, women DON'T KNOW HOW TO THINK. SHOUL SHALT NOT THINK, SAYS LORD THY GOD.
Why does this happen, all this, above, not the command?
The reason men can capture and train animals is not only because animals have habits and can be observed for those, it is because animals don’t observe habits of men and do not learn about their hunters. Tiger is predictable, even though if in a different and uncontrolled setting she is dangerous. But man makes sure he does not go in to see a tiger in the wilderness without a gun, and in captivity, without a whip, tranquilizer and meat. The tiger never gets out of her/his cage. Only animals get trained and commanded.
The reason slavery is so abominable is because it is one human being training another, and taking advantage of an unworthy advantage of physical strength to deny human potential and violate human mind. Men is physically stronger than a woman, and he is more devious and selfish. This is what allows him to train a woman – literally.
Observe, did women create the dress code for themselves? Did women make schools, originally? Did women create the alphabet, originally? Did women create an image for men? Did women fight back when men commanded women’s looks and behavior? Did women willingly agree, agree to any change of fashion, any demand in their behavior, swallowing the insults to their reproductive systems and sexual organs (!!!!!!), denied their friendships as was demanded, fawned on men? Do they not betray one another, like dogs, for a favor of a man? What animal so willingly fawns on its master, licks the boot that kicks it and bears hungry life, insults, constant production of the young and unwelcome and tiresome affectionate/sexual advances? You are right, no animal. NOT EVEN A DOG. Only animal that is, is a sister of a man, his own half, his own Homo Sapiens suffers thusly, without a choice, with much illusion and with complete denial of her humanity.
Why?
