And so, the KGB. First of all, there is nothing wrong with KGB just like there is nothing wrong with the CIA. KGB worked for a purpose and for a reason, it was full of very smart and devoted people, who did do good work for the country. But for the individuals, it was not a good thing. How simple must be a mind of no intelligence to fail to see this distinction! People feared to speak and to even think Because KGB was everywhere. And people did not feel safe even in their own houses but constantly feared they will be locked away for opposing the order. People used to get sent to Gulag. Why would anyone want to be sent to Gulag? And Russian people opposed the imposed order, do you imagine American people fighting back under the same circumstances? I don't. I just don't see Americans oppose anything, besides the better education and discipline. Based on facts and experience. Would you fight like the Russians fought, against censure, agaisnt violation of the right of expresion, against government starting unnecessary wars and forcing its will upon its people and other countries? Would you opposed the order imposed from above with guns and police and supervision and politics of fear and control? These things I have just names are not only objectionable to the nature of this country, they are also objectionable to human nature. And human nature of Russians, is specifically good nature. For example, Russians are not the leaders in human torture, thievery, murder or rape. They are not and were not known to produce “Mien Kampf” or “Art of War” or “The Prince.” Neither did they initiate a series of crusades or Islamic exterminations of non-Muslims. Russians did not wage war to gain control over oil regions neither did Russians import Asian females to allow spoiled and capricious overgrown boys to remain children and have a mommy. Russians did not do these things in spite of the fact that they did not have Constitutional protections of free expression and the Freedom of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It is here, in America I observe people truly enjoy the Democratic process and speak up their minds. People can curse the government out, say horrible things about it and openly protest those in power. In the ex-Soviet union (it is important to refer to Russian people as Russian people and Russian people during the period of Soviet Republic as Soviet people. "Russian" is an ethnicity whereas "Soviet" is regionality) people would get locked away for making fun of Lenin or Stalin like that. And here people can elect their government and protect themselves with their rights. This is the idea of America. This is the beauty of Democracy. And I am sure if someone did encroach upon your Democratic rights, you would fight back. You would never stand for such an attorcity as someone violating your Constitution and stealing your power from under you.
I have observed another interesting thing: some people have very little knowledge but they use it for everything. It’s like a kid who has received hammer for her birthday and she took it to everything there was around her: the cat, the flower pot, the stove and even her own hand. So there, with your new hammer, baby, every Russian=Communist, every Russian =KGB. Every woman=babaymaker, ho, whore, slut, chick, inferior. Every black person as thief, murderer, rapist.
Did anybody see Monty Python’s “The meaning of life?” Reminds a bit of the song in the first skit “Every Sperm Is Sacred”. Where do most people seem to get their knowledge from? Movies. Movies is the main source, of course. And what movies are being made? Propagandistic for the purposes the director sees fit and for what the budget will be allocated. Today we are friends with China and China presented not a dictatorship and a Communist country, but a great, developing economy. And how come? Let us now do some math to see how many years
Russia was Soviet and how many years China was Communist.
Russian Revolution happened in 1915. In 1920 the leader of a nationalist party, Dr. Sun Yatsen has accepted the Soviet aid. Some time period follows where various communist parties ferment, then comes the WW2, Nationalists loose to communists and in 1949 Mao Tsedong proclaims a creation of the People’s Republic of China. Until today, it remains this Republic of People, the communist republic with a tremendously growing economy. Soviet Union fell apart in 1990. 1990-1915= 75 years China came together as a communist republic in 1949 and still goes strong. So, 2007-1949=58 years 75-58=17 The surplus of years Ex-Soviet Union has over Current People’s Republic of China is some mere 17 years. And in terms of proximity to our time and age where does Ex-Soviet Union stand and where does Current People’s Republic of China stand? Ok, in 1990 the Soviet Union fell apart. Today is 2007 2007-1990= 17 years And when did People’s Republic of China end? Let us calculate. 2007-2007=0 So, Soviet Union has ended 17 years ago and People’s Republic of China ended 0 years ago. And an interesting observation is that the difference in longevity between Ex-Soviet Union and the Current People’s Republic of China is 17 years, and the difference from recent time is about the same -17 years. This means that the Communism of the People Republic of China still goes strong. And so, the Soviet Union has been dead for almost as long as People’s Republic of China is missing from the total years of existence of the Soviet Union.
Soviet Union united many nations and gave them a chance of education and food. Soviet Union educated children for free and people pursued things of the mind and soul. Soviet Union had strong families and values. Soviet Union allowed for things to cost little and the apartment and jobs to be steady, which freed up the mind and spirit for other pursuits. There were down sides to the Soviet Union, such as abuse of power, but where does this not happen? Greedy people abuse power, wherever, whenever, however.
And speaking of cruelty and ways to torture people, let us now look at China again. From what country comes a much beloved book on the art of war, termed "The Art OF War"? The book by Sun Tzu I am sure many of your have read before: China. Who has invented a water torture? Who has put people on the growing bamboo shoots and allowed those to grow through people causing them slow, very slow, painfully agonizing death? Who has broke the little bones of female feet and placed them into painful, torterous means of transportation, the "lily" shoes?Who has starved the peasantry and worked it to death? These people never ate enough and slept in horrible conditions. Who has deprived people of education and caused them heartached and pain?
Let us now look at Sun Tzu's “Art of War”, chapter: Chapter 13 (Employ the Spies), The use of intelligence, sub-chapters: Obtaining Forenowledge, The Divine Web, The Importance Of Counterintelligence, The Essence Of Strategy. Speaking of “KGB”…
The following excerpt is from "The Divine Web":
There are five uses of intelligence;
There is local intelligence;
There is counterintelligence;
There is deadly intelligence;
There is secure intelligence.
When the five intelligences all occur together
and none know of the method,
this is called the Divine Web.
It is the treasure of the Rules.
…Deadly intelligence is working to deceive outwardly.
We knowingly direct the intelligence and pass it to the opponent.
…Secure intelligence is falsifying reports.
…Subtly, very subtly,
nowhere neglect the use of intelligence."
KGB...hmmm...this is who could teach both CIA and KGB a lesson. Too bad KGB is no more, would be fun to watch who would learn faster to control and manipulate own people. There is much more to the book, of course. In its scope it can be compared to Machiavelli’s “The Prince”. As people know, the term “Machiavellian” does not precisely stand to give a compliment to a person. “Machiavellian” stands to describe a manipulative, cold, calculating and heartless individual who for power and gain would sell his own mother. A person with no scruples but extremely cunning and self interested. In fact, self-absorbed to a point of fault.
So, what is it that I am trying to say?
Well, the source of one's information. The movies. Ever wondered why the subject gets chosen for a movie? Who pays for this stuff? Who chooses? Why? And why is it that what is considered to be universally bad: like child abuse, rape, murder, thievery, torture gets overlooked and alternately placed into movies, depending on what benefit which abuse could provide at that moment? I think I have answered my own question, by the way. So, back to the movies. I like taking trains sometime. You get to see all kind of folk. Like today, I got picked on by some dude who just finished watching some new CIA Vs. KGB movie and was lavishly embellishing on the details of it to his obedient and docile girlfriend. I see many guys like that today, they sit them girls down, and talk to them like to little girls. They patiently imbue them with their own ideas and perceptions, and girls listen without ever questioning the validity or factuality of what the guys are going at length on. What I understand is a childlike wonder of a pure of thought and untarnished by exercise brain of a modern day woman in America (ok, a large amount of them) but what I don’t get is how a guy can actually get off having someone so stupid and docile, like a child or an obedient dog sit there listening to his nonsense, flapping her ears like some donkey! What is enjoyable about a partner who is stupid enough not to differentiate between truth and lie, reality and fantasy? No, dear ladies and gentlemen, it is not “normal” to like stupidity. And if it is, there is something wrong with your norm. What kind of a human being could possibly want a donkey, a cow, a hen, a kitten for a mate? Doubtfully, a very intelligent one or a quality person…But ok, to the movies. So, this guy sat his little donkey on the sit and stood in front of her. He looked around and beheld my Slavic face. I was peacefully reading a book at that time. He looked at me, smirked, and went on and one about “Russian spies” – mind you, he would accentuate his talk by casting not so subtle glances at me, “KGB”, character in the movie, CIA. He regurgitated the movie and got on my nerves. The girl listened wide eyed. Finally the train arrived and I was saved from his stupidity and obvious persecution. Why could I not be left in peace? Why did I get profiled for my Slavic face? Why do people here think that 75 years in history out of about 12 centuries of Russian people’s existence (Russia was consolidated into a nation in the 9th century, a pretty interesting story, by the way) will turn Russian into some strange creatures who lack all humanity and personality but have one goal in mind – the well being of KGB is beyond me. And why KGB gets picked out of the wholke range of good things Russia has done for others and for its people, is beyond me. But I do have a couple of ideas as to why this happens.
First of all, people are not suffering from over-education here. Nobody's fault, everything is so abundant and cheap, I don't see why people don't learn. It is so easy. Affordable. Why not study? The movies are not a legitamate source of education, they do not convey the history of Russia and people’s real life. They objectify Russia and make it into a toy enemy soldier that these movie makers term: The KGB. Then, like in a game of chess the figures get moved, and the "information" gets picked up by a screen or a press, “The Russian” enemy, the “KGB” soldie "makes" moves, and the CIA "responds". Practicing this Voodoo on imaginary enemies makes Americans (who got rallied into fighting the non-existent enemy) believe that the "real" enemy will fall, too. And people like it. Its cheap and feels thrilling. Like fast food. And more simple people employ falsity, valuing victory above truth and possessions above possessions of the mind. Uncultured is the word, I believe.
Russia, a great spiritual and progressive country of the mind, spirit and soul is taken advantage of now by America. It is helpless now, recovering from a tremendous economic strain, with morally and physically broken people. As she is struggling to raise, many false legends could be made about her, and all for what? To feed people fast mental food? And at whose expense? At the expense of my people. And who will suffer? American people - they are learning falsity instead of truth, and receiving garbage instead of nutrition. China does not get attacked like that because it has economic weight. Economic weight is being the gold value of humanity, the weight in gold. Humanity, evolution, truth? Ha. But most importantly, what has happened to American anti-Communist stand? China is still, officially, Communist! Does the truth of the matter change? Does China stop being Communist? And does Russia who practices Capitalism for now seventeen years, still Communist? How so?
Why then if the facts point that Russia is not 75 years old, but much older, and is no longer Communist, there are still movies made about KGB? Perhaps because to make movies on a more intelligent level would require to think and to research? Perhaps because people would get dissatisfied with things or start questioning things in their lives? And movies that require much thinking require work - too much mental and physical work. We want quick solution. We want money we don't have to work for.
Uneducated but fully imbued with propaganda people react to a familiar red flag and burrowing the ground like bulls, run forward into movie theatres. Then, once they leave them, who will they seek out in the crowd of people? People with Slavic faces and heavy accents. This is when people like me will get profiled. For what? For nothing. They will F these people’s lives by making them paranoid and judging everything they say or do not on its merits, but as the words of a “Russian”.
I have posted some of my work on community sights and have received precisely the response I feared: threats, commands to "go home to Russia," verbal profiling on the national origins grounds, and much more. I have saved the entries and have posted them below, to demonstrate what the propaganda does to people's lives and how it makes people violate the Constitution, the Amendments, and the Civil Rights Acts.
(In response to my posting of my blog address)
RESPONSE A BY MR. CRAZYDEALS:
Sorry about all the trouble you are having here. Maybe you should go back to Russia. I here it is better now then before. I'm sure Moscow is a safe place to wear a girlie scarf and no one there will choke your dumb ass just for fun. Americans do have strange and foreign ways to amuse ourselves and I guess you ran into one that likes to choke girlie-men with silky sexy scarfs on. Watch out for them crazy people who push other people in front of trains too. And god forbid some perv gets turned on by your scarf and grinds his prick on you in a crowded subway car. Shit happens - get over it.
RESPONSE B BY PHORTYZZ:
haha.well he or she ist bitching.shouldnt he//she know since they obviously came from russia, home of loving dicatorship. they should have stuck it out with communism.-cheers.
(Dana)[There was another lovely response of my being a faggy ass with a fluorescent green scarf, and some pun on words with the name of my blog. (Apparently I was a flaming homosexual (a bear, even!) attempting to pick boys this way with this hard-core name “Ruthlesssbut”. I assume my admirers did not know how to spell (perhaps reading the above comments has hinted at that possibility) and suspected I meant to express my homosexual fervor and availability by describing my aching from desire BUT-T: Ruthless-butt. Gentlemen, it is “butt” not “but.” But thank you for your contribution, nonetheless.) Anyway, that comment got deleted as an extremity of a version of gender and gender identity discrimination]
(Dana) RESPONSE C is particularly interesting if one observes it together with the personal statement made by the author.
The comment: Dana, What mind altering drugs do you use? (by Dumpster Molester) and the subsequent personal logo: “Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. "-George Orwell
(Dana) I found it…curious.
(Dana) RESPONSE D NDE BY MISTERBIG attacked me on the grounds of my gender fluidity and presented what is out in the open for like years now, my personal information which that person took pains to copy and paste on the sight:
Comment:
She is a he
Dana Zakharov Age: 26 Gender: male Astrological Sign: Aquarius Zodiac Year: Monkey Occupation: Myself
(Dana) What can we gather from this plethora of wisdom besides the typical bashing of gender fluid people and women as well? That I am to be hated first and foremost on the grounds of my being a Russian, then I am to be hated on the grounds of my wearing a green scarf, thirdly I am to be hated on the grounds of my objecting to being chocked or abused, and fourthly I am definitely to be hated because I am such a closeted bear. Have you seen my picture? It is on my page, by and by...
This hatred of Russians does not culminate with 007-style KGB/CIA movies and hateful attempts to suppress all communication regardless of the content on the part of anyone who is from interesting and unique people of the tribe of Russ (amazing tribal people united into a people and went on to defend themselves against invasions from three different people: Mongols, wild tribes, Nordic tribes. PS. For those of you who read a lot of spy books and are paranoid “information” does not mean “spy information”. The meaning of the word is called “denotation” and the associated with the usage meaning of the word is called “connotation”. “Denotation” is what the word means without socio-politico-personal association, and “connotation” is what a word comes to mean with the help of propaganda or social experience. But the word DOES NOT become its connotation, it is only in the minds of simple and uneducated people that the two are the same. Just like “matter-energy” gets to be the same for them, loosing the conversion process in the middle…). It also extends to a level of personal interaction, making the lives of our hard working and decent people the live of dogs. My recent ex-lover remarked, stretching after a decent love making: “Russians are dying out, ha ha.” When I asked him what prompted him to say this thing to my face, he looked at me with complete innocence present only in children or mentally pure (i.e. lacking the burden of intellect and pains of reason) people and said: why, what did I say? He then attempted to put his arm around me. Apparently I was expected to join-in on this ganging up against my own people who not only done nothing wrong, but HAVE FOUGHT AND STOPPED HITLER. They have also FOUGHT AND STOPPED NAPOLEON. And regardless of how many try to steal the merit of people who died protecting the ideals of freedom and truth, who have laid their bodies out for the motherland and for other people, not letting the two tyrants your propaganda today glorifies to pass into Sacred Russia and from there to the rest of the world, the truth remains. And it is not only unpleasant to hear thne remarks of people who do not know the full history of other people on whom they are remarking, it is particularly unpleasant to hear remarks about good people, people who have soaked their own land with their own blood to protect the world and the ideals of truth, loyalty, friendship, country, freedom, people who are intelligent, wholesome and good, and who share the American ideals freedom and equality. And moreover, these people you remark on have died and defended their country and the universal ideals you today, here, profess to uphold.
Now, how does the professed love of humanity and ideals goes together with the persecutions you are now waging against Russian people, women people, transgender people, people who speak their minds, philosophers, educated people? None of your reasons for hatred are non-discriminatory. None of the fervent promotion of a bland single-mindness to the exclusion of all ideological opposition is Democratic. None of the attempts to prevent people from speaking if these people are Russian people or women or say something that disagrees with you is Constitutional or Democratic. The persecution on the grounds of people’s nationality or gender, alongside with persecution (and dare I say, the most severe one out of all aforementioned ones you practice with clear conscience) of thinkers and those who call you bluff and put two and two together, is characteristic of this country.
Your practices remind of the practices of ex-Soviet Union whose tyranny some of you have dared to throw in my face. And your hate of diversity of mind and thought and reasoned opinion is strikingly Non-American. And especially, Non-New Yorkan. I do wonder, where did all the cool people – with spiked hair, with dirtied with paint jeans, with vivacious and engaging discussions, with folk hanging around the East Village and just chilling out, playing their music instead of chasing the dreams of power, practicing on their innocent girlfriend a freaky mind control (read “turning normal people into retards” and “how to gain and unfair advantage”) and figuring out more ways to prostitute their art? I look for them artists for which New York is known for. I also wonder what happened to a Statue Of Liberty on the car plates?
And to top your Anti-American practices (not in a political sense but in a factual and ideological sense of: America is a Constitutional Democracy and if you are a tyrant and a persecuting jerk you are not, by definition, an American because it is the land for people who came here for refuge from persecution) you also seem to have developed an acute form of schizophrenia, and a behavior that is fearful of its own shadow. Just watch you folks in the city, at the meetings, on the subway platform, in the banks! The constant looking over the shoulder, scared face, big eyes, shaking hands, inability to communicate two words without stumbling over oneself, inability to look another human being in the eyes, inability to differentiate between the right and the wrong, friend and foe, a betrayal or loyalty! A paranoid disposition many of you seem to sport today is a sign of a psyche sick and harassed by fears and suspicions. I smell the presence of Nazi Germany techniques, or perhaps, Japan? A medical term for people with ill and traumatized psyche is “psychotic”. These people are EXTREMELY dangerous to others and to themselves.
I have decided to present you with definitions of the terms we all use today. All terms are as defined in Merriam-Webster online dictionary. [Bold underlined touch ups are mine]
-Communism: Etymology: French
1 a : a theory advocating elimination of private property b : a system in which goods are owned in common and are available to all as needed2 capitalized a : a doctrine based on revolutionary Marxian socialism and Marxism-Leninism that was the official ideology of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics b : a totalitarian system of government in which a single authoritarian party controls state-owned means of production c : a final stage of society in Marxist theory in which the state has withered away and economic goods are distributed equitably d : communist systems collectively
-Socialism:
1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods2 a : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state3 : a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done
-Capitalism:
: an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market
-Democracy: Etymology: Middle French democratie, from Late Latin democratia, from Greek dEmokratia, from dEmos + -kratia –cracy
1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections2 : a political unit that has a democratic government3 capitalized : the principles and policies of the Democratic party in the United States
-Tyranny: Etymology: Middle English tyrannie, from Middle French, from Medieval Latin tyrannia, from Latin tyrannus tyrant
1 : oppressive power
-Oligarchy:
1 : government by the few 2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control 3 : an organization under oligarchic control
-Republic: Etymology: French république, from Middle French republique, from Latin respublica, from res thing, wealth + publica, feminine of publicus public
1 a (1) : a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government b (1) : a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government c : a usually specified republican government of a political unit
-Federal: Etymology: Latin foeder-, foedus compact, league; akin to Latin fidere to trust
1 archaic : of or relating to a compact or treaty2 a : formed by a compact between political units that surrender their individual sovereignty to a central authority but retain limited residuary powers of government b : of or constituting a form of government in which power is distributed between a central authority and a number of constituent territorial units c : of or relating to the central government of a federation as distinguished from the governments of the constituent units3 capitalized : advocating or friendly to the principle of a federal government with strong centralized powers; especially : of or relating to the American Federalists4 often capitalized : of, relating to, or loyal to the federal government or the Union armies of the United States in the American Civil War5 capitalized : being or belonging to a style of architecture and decoration current in the United States following the American Revolution
-Revolution: Etymology: Middle English revolucioun, from Middle French revolution, from Late Latin revolution-, revolutio, from Latin revolvere to revolve
1 a (1) : the action by a celestial body of going round in an orbit or elliptical course; also : apparent movement of such a body round the earth (2) : the time taken by a celestial body to make a complete round in its orbit (3) : the rotation of a celestial body on its axis b : completion of a course (as of years); also : the period made by the regular succession of a measure of time or by a succession of similar events c (1) : a progressive motion of a body around an axis so that any line of the body parallel to the axis returns to its initial position while remaining parallel to the axis in transit and usually at a constant distance from it (2) : motion of any figure about a center or axis
FAQ:
Q: What is American form of government?
A: Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition [From World Factbook]
Post Scriptum (P.S.): My apologies for not editing enough and subjecting you to a mental pain of reading the work raw. At this point, due to a heavy schedule, look upon me benevolently and consider this a Sushi dish. I will start cooking my meats and vegetables when the time and a surplus of sleep will allow. I will find time to do that.
Thank you.
