..LOVE, LOYALTY,DECENCY AND DEVOTION:
Someone sent me an interesting comment in response to this journal. They have complimented my work but have desired something new. “Just about every government, religion, social group, and business uses these principles (me: principles of manipulation of human psyche and decency) I've even seen them codified, though I can't recall where at this moment." The person further expressed a desire to see me develop the work to encompass the details and the formulas of the abuse and the wrong doing conducted. I will head your voice, and attempt to do that.I wish to add to what you've said that this 'ruleset' of abuses exists not only in society by dominant greedy "leaders" but mostly among men against women. Please check out my “Turning normal people into retards” to see how I succeeded in tracing the psychological and physical warfare declared on the normal people by someone who desires power on a massive scale. The small examples of it can be found among male lovers who find female lovers to gain their attention and love in order to use those for own means and gains, and among male people who find ways to irritate, abuse and harass female people in order to gain on them unfairly.
The danger of these manipulation is not in their massive scaleness but in their small and omnipresent traces in our every day life. These techniques are practiced almost everywhere today and are the greates cause of distress of the fabric of society. Some few examples could be: wanting for someone to leave their job so you could have it, make a woman you fear appear stupid and even quarter human, mocking the old and accomplished woman using horrific irrational beliefs about "old hags" to steal away the attention and respect are all examples of these actions. Every time someone uses irrationality and gossip, false witnessing and brings trumped up charges, chooses to use an ad hominem argument, these forumulas are in use. The person using them is shamelessly riding on other people's tailcoats and arrives to receive more, more, and once again, more.
I will start with an example of our human society. At all times did we observe a power inequality of genders, a situation where one gender overlooked basic humanity and exercised a non-judicial non-moderation. One gender was completely and utterly enslaved, decided for and spoken for. Women’s persons, bodies, minds, souls, all were subjected to a man, either through an authority of "God", or an authority of sheer physical strength. Some who may or will say that men are smarter too, and that, alongside with a claim that women are SOOO MUCH physically weaker, I will refute. The work that I am taking upon myself is definitely a work of many months and would require a more thorough research as well as dedication of funds and resources in order to be more demonstrative, what I am doing now is with what I was able to learn mostly by myself and by the grace of God, without much resources.But I will provide a basic sketch and a foundational basis of the underlying argument.
THE PHYSICAL STRENGTH ARGUMENT:
Conclusion: Men are physically stronger. Women are physically weaker.
Proof: Observe the reality.
Proof 2: Observe history.
The argument is an argument of circularity. Why? Well, because it uses own cocnlusion as a premise, therefore using an uproved premise as a foundational stone. Wait, it gets more dizzying. It uses its own premise that is its own conclusion as a premise to prove that conclusion that it is. Nice, eh? Great Patriarchy has a lot of those. They are called "logical fallacies." (My tasty delight special.)
looking back into history, we can see people use the same argument: women are weaker. And with that “conclusion” they build a reality that we live in today. How? Easily. While women are taught to do embroidery, taught to stay at home and to move from a cradle to kitchen sink to kitchen stove, men, from a young age taught to use their bodies. They (the MALES of course) are given sports exercise, they are given proper food – meat, vegetables, fruit, while girls are fed grain, left overs, scraps. Even when I was growing up, grandmother and uncles and aunts always tried to feed the boys of the family with more meat, more potatoes, more everything while I was given cake, cake, cake. I was also offered meat but it was strangely not for the growth of my muscles nor brain, but this vague and ambiguous "health." I always heard thigns about my mysterious "womb" and when it was spoken about it looked like I did not exist and that the women in the family hated me for it. I did not know why. But some cousins in the family were cool and were very nice to me and I felt deep love and believe in me, and pity. Great great aunt Manya, I love you, and you,. my dead uncle Volodya, you guys loved me, I know it. I love you two. Peace and blessing. Aunt Maya would always say: eat the meat, eat the meat, and I think she saw the boy in me, I always enjoyed myself so much there eating. And playing with my cousin too, we had agood time. But anyway, I feel sad when I speak of boy love and friendship: I had a boy once, whom I loved, who, I thought, loved me too. He has betrayed me deeply, and has left me to die, in the dessert, in the vacuum. I have survived by miracle. I have also found out that he run around trying to gai ncredit and fame while I was laid out dead on my infested mattress, stinky floor and crazy Bushwick neighborhood. I have never recovered since then. I always feel like a dead person, but still walking, somehow.
And so, the eating habits of girls. I have also gained so much excessive weight and lost a lot of my natural teeth ude to the promoted cake and sweets tendencies, its like my mother conspired against me and my health while professing completely the opposite! I do think that that's what she thought girls should eat. So, soon, as a result of the diet and sedentary habits, I could not run up the stairs without breathing heavily. My mom has taken me off the only sport I was taking and loved: fencing. The truth as to why she did that, never came to me. Perhaps I tried to flirt with someone in a wrong way? Perhaps I was becoming too good and she was afraid to make a girl so good? Who knows these things if they are not told...If walking up the stairs was a problem, running constituted the very offence against my senses.My body and soul were ver ystrong though, and rebelled. I became a "tomboy" and played sports with guys, played games and run up and down the stairs, vastly enjoying myself and my fat but manifesting in its sporty intent, body.
How did my surroundings react? My grandmother made fun of me and called me a “boy”! Thankfully my mind was never weak and I grappled with the concept and...won! I asked her how it was possible I was acting as a "boy" if I was a girl? She did not know what to say. She just kept repeating it. I had my first victory then, actually, the second. The first was when my mother has broken my cranium with a top from a aluminum pot. I remember seeing the metal disk fly, and then feeling dizzy. I stood there and inside of me something said that this was no right. I knew it then with all little fibers of my child soul: this was the ultimate betrayal. I was not wanted. I was not even wanted to be alive. I lived in the house of people who did not want me and there I was, like a late guest who has nowhere else to go and has quiet outstayed his welcome. I stood there and blood dripped down, finally my grandma run up to me and started crying. She wiped the blood off my forehead, and kept repeating: and she (the child in Russian) just standing there, and the blood is dripping, dripping. She cried and was waking up to the terrble reality of my incarnation. I was not wanted. I was borrowing life. I was not a human being to these people. I never got the stiches, and there is still a hole in my forehead, with some skin stretched over it. The bones never tryly mended. Lately, I started feeling terrible pains and the hole in my forehead always pulsates and feels like there is a black hole in there and it hurts with this strange, past lives type of memory fanthom pain. When I met you, my beloved, I used to press your palm against this hole, when you would sleep or were resting. I felt so at peace, so happy, so loved! I felt I could forget about this past experience, and live, live for real! So, the survival after the encounter with the metal disk at the age of five, was my first victory. My life and body were strong. But in order to survive I had to become smart and perceptive, without loosing the spirit. So, I learnt to see and foresee danger. I learnt to fend for myself. I learnt to fight. I learnt to think. My soul told me that they will not try to kill me again after this, but they will kill my mind. So, my main job became the protection of my mind. I learnt to think and to analyze. To argue. To object. To say no. To be silent but see everything and record everything. By the age of 11 when my grandmother has challenged my concept of myself, I could cross swords with her to my victory. Furhter victories came easy but the people around me began to take displeasure in an argumentative and assured girl, for I was entering the age of teenagehood, where all rights of a human being a female may have otherwise, are suspended, and ultimately, removed.
I would like to spent some time on my grandmother's argument in order to demonstrate the fallaciousness of the statement. A girls who runs and enjoys sports is acting like a boy. What are the premises, and what is the conclusion.
*Premise: girls are not sporty
*Premise: boys are sporty
Conclusion: if runs and loves sport,a boy.
A person who uses this type of an argument in a deductive style, is either mistaken or deliberately misleading. Why? Because deductive argument presents a conclusion as the universal truth, as an absolutely true statement. Any exception to the conclusion will render this conclusion false. But here was an example that stood against the conclusion. So, when there is a case of an example standing against the conclusion, that conclusion is proved false. Any further usage of the conclusion as The Universal Truth is either a deceit or a mistake. The conclusion is either true or not true, it cannot be partially true in a deductive form. For partial truths there exist an inductive form of argument: an argument of probnability.
To demonstrate the amazing point of "validity" and "truth" I will bring in the following example:
Dana is human.
All humans eat loci,
Therefore, Dana too eats loci.
Although as we can see the conclusion is absurd, following the form of the argument, no other possible conclusion is possible.The argument is valid but absurd.
Whereas in an inductive argument, the following would occur:
Dana eats loci.
Jack eats loci.
Nancy eats loci.
Dana, Jack and Nancy are all humans.
Most humans eat loci.
Jeniffer is human.
Therefore, Jennifer most probably eats loci.
The conclusion of a second argument is not as certain as of the first one. In fact, the certainty is not guarranteed but approaches a greater or less probability. What is the trick though in the first argument? How is it that one could arrive at such absurdity for a conclusion and still have a …valid argument? Because validity of an argument does not depend on its content. We often encounter this reflection of truth in real life where although one may be completely guilty of a crime, if the evidence is missing one goes free. In a trial, a proper form, the "validity" is very important, and if the proper form has not been observed, the person cannot be convicted. In America we have a special provision called “double jeopardy” which simply means that no one can be tried for the same offence twice. Regadless of the evidence, the proper format of treatment of a human being will be observed and that is: no standing a trial for the same crime, twice. Here is an example of a deductive logic in action. We may view a trial as a conclusion of an argument, and the necessary components as its premises. One of the premises of a conclusion "trial" in this country, is "evidence". And if evidence to a crime is present, the conclusion of a trial will be different from when the evidence is missing. It is irrelevant what the evidence is: presenting a true man falsely or false man truly, providing it is in a certain form, it is reviewed. One thing remains true: WITHOUT AN EVIDENCE, THE CONCLUSION "TRIAL" WILL NOT HAPPEN. Often the falsity and the truth get missproven or proven wrong. These are not validity.
So, the deductive argument can sneak by us with its proper form but absurd and nonsensical conclusion. Often it happens on the grounds of a female mind. It is like a beautified woman who is an empty shell of a human being within. What to do? How to protect oneself? Review the premises. In an example of my grandmother, she has never reviewed the premises that have led her to conclude such thing as a healthy young strong child loving sports is…abnormal. In her mind, her reality, gender was a prerequisite for sports, and there was no otherwise! And what I brought up earlier, is how come a false argument (remember that even if ONE example found to stand against the conclusion of a deductive argument, it is false, although could still be valid) is defended and “proved” to be true. How come that it is not divested from its pretensions to the crown of a deductive conclusion and placed where it belongs, among its inductive counterparts? Well, as I also said earlier, when a false deductive argument is defended and presented as true, there obviously other than "search for truth" motives. Which motives though, could lead people to keep concluding, century after century, even with the examples to counterpoise their conclusions, that women are physically weaker? What induces people to outrightly lie? And as I said, the circular argument becomes a means of interaction where people point to the conclusion of an argument as a proof, whereas the premise of the argument is its conclusion...
Here is a favorite patriarchal "observation" and placed in "truth value" package, wisdom:
Conclusion: Women are weaker.
*Premise: Women know their place.
Q:Why are women weaker?
A: Because they know their place.
Q: Why do they know their place?
A: Because they are weaker.
Q: And why are they weaker?
A: Because they know their place.
Q: And why do they know their place?
A: Because they are weaker.
Q: And why are they weaker?
A: Because they know their place.
Q: And why do they know their place?
A: Because they are weaker.
The argument uses its own conclusion as a premise, sneaking by us with its blatant, screaming and haughty falsity.It is, however, technically, valid. When these "arguments" are numerous and they are complicated, it is much harder to fight them, especially when there is a lot of power base built around them and much is invested into them. And so, armed with an invalid at times, and often false deductive argument, the idea that women are physically weaker is forged everywhere. Upon that argument builds and manifests the reality we live, it becomes and manifest in accordance to the resonings laid out.
Now, you probably know that proper nutrition, exercise as well as encouragement and moral, societal and parental support are all important for the growth of a child. And what kind of support is offered to a young girl who wants to do sports, who enjoys her body and a play with others? None. And century after century, a bred helplessness and dependence...People can breed dogs and cats. Sheep, goats, cows, horses. People too can be bred and can become domesticated and not unlike the cattle be allocated and bred to be more animals. Once, the dog was a wolf, you know. Now it will lick the boot kicking her, and wait around until the master comes into a better disposition.
So, over time the circular argument or an outright, pretentious lie is allowed to stand, and people are forced to evolve without the means for development of their certain faculties. They, over time loose that ability that was not encouraged in them. They evolve fractured and incomplete, sick and unable to maintain themselves, or at least to maintain themselves properly. You will ask: if women were truly physical, why did they not object to such a treatment? Please read “turning normal people into retards” to see how the opposition is usually dealt with. Study the nightmare of the Holocaust. Ponder the mystery of slavery. An important factor that is often overlooked by good-hearted people is: intentions or motifs. Not everyone desires to live peacefully and has an intention of following the truth. Some people in fact intend to do the opposite. And so, many men benefit from a false argument that a woman is physically weaker. Also, the mind of a power monger is no count for a mind of a good if smart person. A peaceful person of a good heart and proper intentions desires nothing more than to be left in peace, to live and to evolve. She or he desires to follow the course of nature and their heart, whereas the power monger desires what is not his, and desires control most of all. His greed is immesuarable. And he or she will be equipped in knowing how and where to push buttons on a person he wants to control, because this is an inclination of his heart, and he will not be stopped where normal people are stopped. Tell me, what chance does a child stand against an army? And if a child the army comes to kill be even Hercules, still will he not withstand the army. And a developing individual may be compared to a child. I do not precisely know where the false argument and circular argument originated and why women allowed it, I only know that after a passage of certain time, if allowed a slight advantage, one could gain exponentially. How so? If you have a group of people hell bound on “proving” a falsity, well organized for that purpose, thinking nothing else and having no scruples, then you will have a very strong enemy indeed. And the one who is busy living will be no match for the one who is busy planning warfare and spends all days of his life contemplating the other and her strengths and weaknesses. One must be of a mental disposition to war, to fight and to desire more and at the expense of another to succeed. And men have been so far. History then and our experience now demonstrate it. "Machiavelli", "48 laws of power", "art of war", Medici family, Borgia, these books and true characters have not been written nor played out by women. Wars of conquests, wars of religious persecution, wars for land and dominion were not led by women. And the idea that women are stupid, can’t learn and are only good for reproduction and sex were not invented by women either. Over time women became a despicable race, capable of jealousy, envy and fear and nothing else.
Women did not say they did not want to study or hold positions.Over time though they have learn that they can't or shouldn't. They did not call themselves “bitch,” “chick”, “ho”. “slut”, “cow”, “whore”, “two pieces of brain” and many, many more lovely and descriptive names our brothers have given us. And here comes the main question: how is it that women agreed to such a treatment? Once the bad person gains advantage over the good person, the good person for a while will find it hard to believe that someone could be so bad. Meanwhile the bad grows in strength and stature. Once it grows more, it establishes power-holds and creates a network of control. In order to retain power, propaganda must come into play. The continuous presentation of someone you want to keep down as stupid, weak, bad, devious is important. Over time, the message sinks into the unconsciousness. There, a person creates a self-fulfilling prophecy whereas she or he comes to believe in things that were said about her or him. Then, on top of propaganda, the course of action in accordance to an official stand is followed. If the stand is that women are dumb, weak and should be kept in place, no education nor fair treatment will be provided. The policy goes as far as to deny the political representation as well. And without opportunities to develop physical strength, with mind numbing accusations, lack of proper nutrition, lack of proper support, lack of proper mental material for a young mind to work with, lack of interest in one’s person, and outright destruction of any attempts at self will, self destiny and independence nipped at the butt and destroyed, together with a subsequent lesson being made off attempting to evolve person. This lesson, presents an evolving individual as wicked and/or against God (whose authority was set up earlier as the ultimate judge and of course, in favor of patriarchs and a great patriarch himself. The person, therefore, is against God himself! And women can barely stomach another smart female because of the incredible jealousy and stupidity they are immersed into. Add to this a rivalry among women and hatred they have for each other, cultivated for in them, by men, for centuries. It is so bad that the communication between our own gender is not allowed at all, and every attempt is mocked or made into sexual one. I have observed that women fear greatly to speak to one another, as if their interest cannot be anything outside of s sexual one. How about a mental interest? Or sharing of the skills? Or helping out with directions for something? Or just chatting with a similar soul? Why is it that women believe they must hate other women and why do they think that denying a natural interest or desire to share a skill or a piece of information is abnormal? Because through a series of psychological manipulations women being friends with other women are presented as either a lesbian, funny or scared. Disapproving faces, smirks, comments are all made. Woman’s reality norm seems to be outlined within either the medium of a home maker, or a seductive sex thing or a woman who holds job but goes from train stop to the office to train stop to her home. Natural, organic growth where a person may fart, laugh, talk to strangers, play ball and express her opinion as due in the Democratic society, is denied her. Women always self-consciously look around: have they done the right thing? It came to a point that a man can get away with an outright wrong if only he threatens with his snaky mind to present a woman as either whorish, stupid or un-sweet. He uses a falsely made criteria of “excellence” coupled with created at proper cues public censure to control her actions and to protect himself from justice. People that have no interest in right and wrong will always lead over those who have an interest in right and wrong so long as society remains unconscious and largely bad than good. And this is how a man can get away with pushing a woman on the street, calling her names, stealing her job and hurting her in a thousand and one way. I also submit a real life excerpt from a work of another author:
“Blind justice” by Brian Muldon
Maureen FitzGerald was a tall, extroverted lawyer who loved to play the piano. She had abandoned a career as a performer and gone to law school at the urnging of her father, whom she adored. “You’re talented and as smart as anyone I know, and I don’t see why you shouldn’t use yourgifts to their fullest. You’re a fighter,” he told her. “Enjoy your art, but make your living with your smarts. You’ll be rich and a marvel at parties to top it off.”
Maureen traveled on the fast track at one of the Philadephia’s largest and aggressive firms. She was the youngest female partner and, as an employee benefits specialist, oversaw the firm’s pension plan and investements. evne the most senior parners came to her for advice. Her billings were always high, and so were her year-end bonuses.
The firm recently had brough in a senior “rain-maker”from another law firm across town. His client base and reputation made him a powerful and intimidating figure from the outset. Whether it was secretaries, associates, or money, Norm got his way. No one wanted to face his wrath if he didn’t get what he wanted. Even clients were frightened of his anger and rarely questioned his strategy or his bills. Norm came into Maureen’s office one afternoon to talk about taking some of the pensios money out of the trust account for an investment he wanted to make.
“I understand that I have to get your permission to invest my money,” Norm scowled.
Maureen held her ground. “I’m sorry, Norm, but you can’t wothdraw the funs. If you do, you’ll expose us to some serious taxes on the whole pension account, and we might even lose our exempt status. We can’t take the chance.”
Norm’s face reddened. He wanted to play ball with the people at this polite, silk-stockinged firm, but letting them hold on to his money was a humiliating he didn’t intend to endure. From a woman, yet. It’s one thing to hire them, because you practically have to. But to give them control over the money , that was a big mistake, as this young female was clearly demonstrating. Everybody bends the rules. That’s the way smart people play the game. But this self-righteous little person was trying to pull a power trip on him, and he had no intention of letting her run his life or his investments.
Norm exploded. A secretay at the other end of a very long hall could hear him shouting at Maureen. He didn’t even bother to close the door of Maureen’s office. A little public dressing-down might do her some good. “Who in the hell do you think you are? Do you really think I intend to ask your permission to invest my own goddamn money?” Norm was at the top of his game. He could feel Maureen shrinking before his very eyes.
Maureen didn’t blink. Norm went on for another ten minutes. All work on the east side of the thirty-fifth floor stopped. Nobody moved a muscle in a dozen offices.
Norm threatened Maureen’s bonus, her client relationships, her position on the pension committee, her partnership status. “If you can’t do the job – and you clearly can’t – I’ll bring someone who can!”
Maureen sat silently at her desk for a full fifteen minutes after Norm left. Then she picked up her coat and her purse and walked out ohf her office, out of the building, and a mile and a half to her home. The afrenoon breeze felt good. She couldn’t muster a single thought. She was empty, clean as a sandblasted wall.
It was late afternoon. Maureen sat down at her piano, pumped the pedals for am inute and launched into Mozart. She closed her eyes. Everything went blank. She opened her eyes. Nothing. Couldn’t see anything but a dark screen somewhere. Maybe the lights were out. She slumped to the floor. Maureen was able to find the telephone after crawling aimlessly around her apartment for almost four hours. It was 7:15pm when the phone rang at her father’s house.
“Daddy, help me,” she said. “I think I’ve supposed to be at my piano lesson, but I can’t find the door.” They tested her for weeks. Finally, a specialist from Chicago flew in. It was a stroke. An artery in her neck had burst under stress, and she was blind. Prognosis uncertain. Could be permanent.
The firm sent her flowers. The managing partner came to visit. When he left her room, he talked the records department into giving him her chart, in violation of all rules and state privacy law. Better reassign the clients. Quietly, the firm found another benefits lawyer and started assigning new matters to him.
But within a month, Maureen was back at the office. Her secretary read Maureen’s ,ail to her and took dictation. Maureen was too tough to let this get to her. Her billings stayed even. Gradually, Maureen’s sight began to return. Within six months, she had most of it back except the peripheral vision. Inexplicably, however, her billings, however, had started to decline. The senior partners with client relationships had stopped referring matters to Maureen. The new benefits lawyer they had hired while she was in the hospital was getting all the assignments.
Maureen’s year-end distribution was lower than any other lawyer at her level. She noticed that all the males with her level of experience were being compensated at a rate much higher than hers. When Maureen raised this with the managing partner, he just shook his head. “It’s just a matter of the numbers. You haven’t put in the hours that these other folks have billed. It’s nothing personal. And it is certainly isn’t about your gender.”
Maureen was outraged. “But no one sends me any more referrals! How can I bill if there;s no business?”
It was clear they wanted her out of the firm. Norm was too powerful to fight.
Maureen hired a lawyer and prepared to file a sex discrimination lawsuit. When word got around, she felt the hostility of virtually every male in the firm. It got so cold at partner’s meetings she practically had to wear a sweater. She was controversial , a problem, and now an adversary.
[The author conveys how he have met with Maureen and her lawyer and was told that the firm had agreed to mediation. In response to author’s request that Norm would attend the mediation, the firm has sent a partner.]
..I met with the partner who has been designated by the firm’s management committee to handle the negotiations. He had been one of the Maureen’s closest friends at the firm. Now it was his job to dispose of her.
“We reject the notion that anything he [Norm] did caused any of her problems. It was a pre-existing weakness in her artery. Even her doctor said that anything [and not an exposure to one of the cultivated for centuries and since the childhood in every woman sense of fear to public censure and “shame”] might have triggered it. She was an accident waiting to happen.” He smiled and continued.” Norm will not be in attendance. We go ahead without him, or not at all.”
The end of an excerpt.
Aha, I still did not address the issue of how it is that these higher things like loyalty, love,devotion, friendship are being spat at. Very simple, I need to fill in the blanks. With the premise of women being weaker, there is also a premise of women being inferior. In fact, many ancient belief systems (who have structured our today's reality. All reality today in some way, shape of form go back into the times long gone, into the darkness of ages, the roots being immersed in superstition, prejudices and strange and pagan belief systems) profess a woman to be so inferior that she is actually NOT counted as being a human! She is akin to a cow, sheep, hen and a breeding bitch...Very interesting selection, have to say... She sometibmes amuses you by scaling a mountain of which she has a diffuculty getting off, excellent for milking for "ENERGY", provides a warm cloak of feminine care and protection, lays golden eggs of opportunity through her charm and perceptiveness that we, as patriarchs refer to "cunning", and provides you the pups for the building of your future empire. Ancient Greeks believed that a love for a woman on the part of a man was an overlook and a weakness, where is a love for another man was honorable, Romans had no formal laws of protection for women up until 450BC with the passage of Twelve Tables (codified oral and "intuited" tradition) and a male was an absolute head of the family with an authority over his children and wife, ancient Jews have even received a prayer form the Lord which was supposed to be said every morning "Thank you God for not making me a woman" (ancient Jews destroyed the cults of feminine religion and banished even the ancient and Jewish concept of Shechina, a female version of God, a fundamental and important element, you could ask the mystiques if you don't believe me) and Muslims were commanded to keep women at home (it was good for women, you see!) and under covers. Duh. Looke at the Koran and the Niddle East. Archangel Gabriel came to Muhammed to give him Lord's revelations. Archangel Gabriel is a great patron of women, an angel of annunciation and a feminine left pillar of a tree of life. He is often depicted as a woman, a rare thing for an angel in a patriarchal mind to be depicted as. I suspect he gets such bad rap precisely because he is a protector of higher qualities and the Angle of Hail and Fire of Soddom and Gomorrah. He is also the judgment and the protector of hope, do you imagine this Archangel assisting in creating a religion where a woman, a Sacred Woman (Mary is a Queen of All Angels) is treated the way Muslims treat her? I think that the true nature of Islam (because it is an interesting religion and was once more of a Zoroastrianism, a mystical and beautiful vision of the world, very spiritual and interesting, but not The Truth) got stolen and appropriated by men with hair, and a lot of it, and they are simply hoarding the truth and taking advantage of people. And I am sure they are suffering because of how they treat the Sacred Holy Feminine.
An interesting thing is that among most ancient people: Phoenicians, Babylonians, Egyptians, Moavites, Ammonites, Assyrians, women gods featured a prominet role and sometimes were solely the objects of adoration and worship. These cultures were known to be prosperous, evolutionary and interesting. In ancient Greece alone, in the great city of Athens Athena Palladis was believed to be a city's protectress and patron. She was a warrior and a goddess of wisdom and mind, worshiped; her sacred branch respected and made forever a symbol of Greece in the mind of many people: an olive branch. But even here men managed to twist the reality and made sacred women, her representations, a slave nation. How amazing: such an advancement in culture and civilization, such an elevated way of thinking along with such a neglect and even outright disrespect to one half of a human race. Greeks have officially, in their debates, conlcuded women to be inferior in body and mind. Women, under Greek Democracy had no political representation, no voice, and no public life. They were designated an area of raising children, washing dishes, mending socks, and the sentiments were pretty much, "bitch, shut up" or "get that ho".
The other civilizations as well, were not precisely havens for women. It is a prevalent tendency to day to romanticise the times past and present women in harems busy sucking on men's dicks or plucking out their facial hair or appying cohl, as happy. It is romance, and nothing else. And it sells. And it has like a grain of truth and no truth whatsover in it. A way to sell women things that no sane individual would ever buy or venture out to obtain. Things that are an outright violation of a human code, human behavior and all laws of decency and humanity. But a simple presentation of something "AS-IS" does not make that something IN REALITY, as presented. The simple term for that "presentation" is PROPAGANDA. When someone wants you to think like what they think, they will not invite you to reason and think, they will surpass that important function of your being, a function that is protective of your soul and mind, and go directly for your...subconsicous, imbuing you with ideas, thoughts, images that favor their "reality." They will harass you, violate your peace and force themselves and their perception upon you. And if you are not careful, before you know, you end up believing outright nonsense: like bound feet are healthy for you, women really do not want to have a political representation, women love being hit, spoken poorly to and raped.... Be careful of what you allow your psyche to be imbued with. It gets infected and only a fresh concept could get the disease, out.
So, this is only a little snapshot of reality of the past from which we take examples and draw upon our everyday life.
The prevalent tendency for Asia, especially among women, suprises me. It is in no other place but Japan, women had no rights and could be killed at will and with impunity. It is in no other place but China, women' s feet were bound. To put this in layman's terms: YOUNG WOMEN'S TOES WERE BROKEN AT A YOUNG AGE, THEN FOLDED AND BOUND BY SOME PIECE OF CLOTH. THESE WERE PLACED IN SMALL CLOGS AND STAYED IN THOSE FOREVER. THE ROMANTIC NAME (THE "FEMININE MYSTIQUE") OF THESE SMELLY, SWOLLEN AND HURTING FEET WERE CALLED "THE LOTUS FEET. MEN GOT OFF AND SOCIETY SMILED BENEVOLTENTLY. An interesting fact is that the practice of "Lotus Feet" came to end only at the beginning of twentieth century, with the spread of Western ideas of equlaity, prosperity and representation that took place, under those circumstances, as Communism. But it was Western influence, nonetheless. Carl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Lenin have influenced the Chinese revolution and Mao was no one but an adherent of that policy mixed in with the ideals of China. To which extent, I would not be able to tell you know, I have not had a chance to study it yet.
And so, a person positioned that low on a ladder, even as far as to be at the roots of civilization, a woman, can possibly be expected to be treated fairly? Or a promise made to that being respected? Or such an honorable Greek influenced term as "friendship" (ancient Greeks had a lot of respect for friendship and considered it sacred) allowed to be practiced with a mere woman?! Women are not people, they are animals, and any promises made to them are null and void, any allegiance that one may feel to them is weakness and a REAL MAN will show the HO AND WHORE AND BITCH how to "respect" him. She may even be slapped around a couple of times. In the words of my older friend Kevin "I still, sometimes, can hear the screaming of women, on the weekends and evenings (he laughs a little and coughs slightly. Then recomposes himself) Husbands would get home and then start beating them up beat." "Why, Kevin?" I asks suprised. Kevin smiles:"I husband could beat a wife if he did not like a dress she wore, or something like that." And now let's do this fun thing called a "timeline." Yes, he is in his fifties, and today is 2007. 2007-50=1957 So, approximately Kevin was born in 1957, plus at least 12, ok, 15 (to have such a capacity for memory and reflection he must have been an adult. Or young adult. Simple knowledge of psychology could help me understand this. Children rarely question the "way of the fathers" because surrounded by an environment we come to perceive it as "normal" and do not question it. Something really awul has to happen for a child to become conscious as early as five or something. A forced growth by an exposure too early and in the wrong amounts and proportion too, can wake the young consciousness up and expose it to the world too early. And there are also some "old children", old souls who seem to be aware and awake even at birth. But otherwise, a child would be unable to reflect until he or she becomes a somewhat of a mature, capable of reflection entity, which may happen around teenagehood. To remember and reflect on information today, he had to remember it and recall it. So, let's see, he had to mark it then,therefore it had to be remarkable in some way, shape or form for someone who would remember it, remember it. Then, he would have to be able to understand what was going on and what were the component parts - like causes and effects, record it as something, record it properly so that he would be able to extract it from his memory today, and today this memory extracted must be consciously recorded so that Kevin is able to counterpose that memory as a conscious tool with the reality which is accepted as a norm of today. To be able to mark in details and say on what scale it happened, to have retained that memory, Kevin must have been at least a young adult), 1957+15=1972 So, in the year of 1972 CE, give or take five years minus or plus, perhaps in 1967 women were being beaten up by husbands for "wrong" dressess and just as a recreational sport activity. And 2007-1972=35 So, this has occured...thirty five years ago only! Many of you are still alive today to remember those times. The questions that should arise are: why did it stop and what does such a behavior reflect upon in a human psyche?
And so, thirty five years later (and the change in mentality did not occur overnight. It is not like in the year 1972 men were beating up and abusing women, then they stopped all, in masive amounts, overnight. It probably happened gradually) and so, at least I would give ten years for mentality to change, especially that things were happening slower than, this gives us the 80's, or 1980s. And from then on, the beating on a physical level may have stopped but how about mental abuse? Or psychological? Or psychic? Many of the examples I have provided so far on this blog, the series of "Unsafe New York" feature precisely that type of mental, psychic and psychological abuse. All you have to do is correlate the facts with the causes or possible causes. Then test that correlation, goddamnit.
To test: Think of an argument that could cause a given reality. Then think of an argument that is opposite of the argument you've just worked with and test it too. Things don't arise in the vacuum, you know. All these ideas of quantum physics with which your poor minds have been imbued with, are like an ancient Greek wine and have to be diluted with water. An example? Observe.
An argument:
Matter is not energy.
People state this today with an absolute lack of understanding and in a state of ignorance of what it is they are stating.The concept that they state is a physics formula. Matter can become energy through a conversion process whereby the jolt is passed through matter, or it is subjected to physical pressure or processes (for example, burning a person on the stake (Joan of Arc)) will convert that person from matter, to energy. Where was a person once, now is a heap of ashes. the matter is now energy. Where is the rest? -Evaporated because you have converted that person's "matter" - in other words, their body- to its elements. ) To convert matter to energy you must BREAK DOWN THE MATTER into its components. And in case of a body, it is the components of the body, and in case of a human psyche, it is components of the psyche, and in case of a human mind, it is components of the human mind. For something to be in a state, some coversion process must have taken place. Without it, there is no state. Stasis, motion; motion, stasis. But just like in case of the physical body, the conversion destroys the unity that something is. In case of people, it translates into death, mental break-down (observe the term), and a psycholocial confusion in the least. The premise "matter is energy and energy is matter" is a fundamental stone of psychological, mental, and psychic manipulation of the human kind. In fact, any falsity and any incomplete information usually is.
So, once I have proven the statement of this reality false, I would find a statement that presents a different reality, and set out to prove it as well.
Who in school lazied off on chemistry or physics? If you didn't, today you would not allow such nonsensical statement as "matter IS energy" to be passed by you. Matter is not energy, it is potentially energy. The conversion process is a part without which matter is not energy. And who could possibly be interested in converting a real, live human being and soul to a heap of ashes, or to a mental zombie or a psychological hysteric?...This very concept on which people pride themselves on is actually rather evil and black magic approach to a human and any life. Very strange.
What are the "conversion" methods for women's psyche? Read the store by Multon, above. Humilation, yelling, deragatory terms that bring evolving and progressing people of women gender to a state of babbling, helpless and abused children. All the "techniques" of harassment I have described in this blog.
Why?
