You must think - or no! he or she has become a Jesus freak! First of all, this terminology is extremely insulting to people who truly believe. If you, "Liberals", want to be respected, why do you not give respect to others? Because you have judged something to be true or untrue, and like a modern day Church-of-Satan (such thing exists, research it) you stand like a guard of what people are allowed to believe or not? Why like Church-of-Satan? A practiced relativity, very Satanistic. What, are you an Inquisition, reversed? Just like reversed racism, religious "tolerance" can be an obnoxious and a horrifying thing. And I observe this to be the case first hand.
But I would like to spend some time with the idea of how many of you come up with your views of the world based on erroneous though valid conclusion. Watch:
We assume that men are superior.
Then we assume that Asian women are superior,
Then we conclude that the two are a match and the rest of the world is their servants.
How do we "assume"? We "assume" by forcing the rest of the world to accept it. We "convince" the world through our superior logic: weaponry, economic pressure, public censure..By instituting a power lever on all levels of society, by inflitrating every crevice with persistent thought pattern that is introduced via advertisements, sold out public opinion upholders, and positive and negative reinforcements we esnure the public remains "convinced." Watch you people even now afraid to say something against Asian female, why, even among yourselves you fear so? Why can't you estimate people on the basis of their merits and not their race? Why Asian females are not discussed for actions they do, as humans? Why White women discussed and why Black women discussed, but not Asians? This is racism. This is preferential treatment. Why do you fear to express, in this free country? Because in your minds you have come to believe that someone can even read your thoughts...Thanks to Chinese infiltration of Communist supervision and paranoid-bred-for-centuries thought pattern! And on top of that, all these games in being special agents do not lead to good things. You are all now paranoid. Ok, back to the subject. So, once the "truth" of something is established by making it appear as "reality" - and that, in turn, is achieved by almost laboratorily manufacturing of that "reality" by suppressing certain elements and allowing others through a system implemented, a system I have outlined in my earlier works. Then, when all the appearances are made to match the "reality" and descent has been suppressed, the idea is floated more openly. It is offered for a "discussion."
-Yes, indeed, people "agree" among themselves, Asian females are superior and men are superior too!
This manufacturing is a price to pay for not liking to think. The safeguards of Democracy are for normal, sane, thinking individuals. Do you know now what "Democracy" stands for in a context, as well? No, wait, I forgot, you don't! You don't read! You abolished history and you truly believe that...there are no rules.
Such idiots.
Ok, next.
How did you "abolish" Satan and think you got away?
Guess what! You didn't!
Here is why.
You think you are so smart. you got rid of Satan!
NOT.
You attacked the name "Satan" and made it appear ridiculous to believe in that "crap"! But you are not that stupid either. What you did, is by "abolishing" the name, you erased the judgments that came with association of actions by that name. By removing a naming power from people, you gave yourself a much larger freedom of action. People now struggling a nameless, faceless enemy, who on top of that "does not exist." There is an old saying: the smartest thing the Devil did, is to convince the world he does not exist. For example, what do we know Satan for? He lies. He cheats. He deceives. He swindles. He blackmails. He appropriates. He destroys. He kills. He makes people go against one another. He tempts you. So, since in people's minds these and more such actions came to be associated with "Satan", you think that by making Satan idea appear ridiculous, you abolish people's judgment of things that incurred a bad name in the first place! Basically, just because these horrible actions had a name of "Satan", once we remove the name, suddenly these actions become good? How so? The actions merrited the name that unifies them because they had something in common. Not because these actions were created by Satan we gave them the name. We have derived, almost scientifically, the existence of some kind of pervading thing among all these actions, some kind of common factor, an underlying current, a permeating force, and judged these actions to be incorrect and gave them a common source out of our religious context.
Now, minus the "Satan" name, how does swindling someone become right? How does cheating on your wife or husband become ok? How does thieving, deceiving and blackmailing ok? Call it what you want? And now you think you are free because you are free to violate codes of humans decency and respectability - and no one can hold you accountable!
So, the name is just a name for observed and judged to be incorrect actions. And if you will say these actions were incorrectly judged to be incorrect, we will fight and I will challenge you. In that case, we will still, no matter how your feminine instinct to hold things together for as long as possible will command you, will not hold me in your fold. I will not be one of your flock, and although I may or may not call you - a Satanist, perhaps I will call you an Orangutan, but over time this "Orangutan" will come to mean the same as "Satan". Who cares for the name. Take the name, Liberals, wrong is still wrong and right is still right. To argue me further on relativity grounds, you will have to become relative yourselves and there I will demonstrate your wrongness. Try, just try to defy "wrong is wrong and right is right" without being concrete. I dare you. Be realtive, liberals, and prove that "right is wrong" and "wrong is right." Can't - it is Aristotel's law of identity.
Goal: fulfilled
Liberals: blocked
Score: supreme
Position: leading
Threat to existence of sanity and reason: deflected
Enemy's extinction probablity: high
To argue "it is all relative" and make big eyes at me and call over your Asian friend to demostrate how dissagreable I am (God, how often and how much I got oppressed by Asian females1 For no reason, just because I was White, terrible rudeness was done to me, horrific obnoxiousnes, bad manners -flashed in my face, things- misrepresented, turns - usurped, gossip - manufactured and spread...) will not work.
I may be dissagreable.
I may be "not feminine."
But I am still right. And I will die right. And after me the rightness will still remain as you continue sipping on your stupid, endless cocktails, sucking an endless procession of dicks (so that patriarchy does not get angry and smite you), and moving your ass to and fro as if the Founding Mothers fought for your right to be a whores legitamized!
PROPER DEFINITION OF THE WORD:
Whore - a person of either gender who sells her or himselff as if there were no other means of survival though there were at the time and made available to that person. That person simply did not have a strong sense of right and wrong, is lazy, and therefore, weak, and therefore, does not deserve respect. Understanding something and respecting something are NOT synonymous.
