Unsafe New York: Part Eight: exposition on acceptance

"YES, I ACCEPT YOU": YOU SICKO

New York. A great city. A huge and important part of this wonderful Constitutional Democracy we live in. A democracy supported by the document called the "constituion." The Constitution of The United States. The extensions of the Constitution came to be knows as its "amendments" and the further expansions on the amendments or the original statures are the "laws" or "acts". The main focus of my work so far lies with observing the blatant, gruesome and screaming violation of what I call the "five factors. These five factors are prohibited discrimination handles: race, national origins, religion, gender, and dissability. The mention of these fives is used as protection against the violation of people' rights for employment, but it reflects on the idea of the nature of this country and its law: these five factors should not be used agaisnt people to take dissadvantage them. What is a dissadvantaging procedure, could also be a procedure of taking of a dvantage. Depending on whose perspective you look from: from the perspective of the victim of discrimination, the violations disadvantage her, from the perspective of the abuser, disscrimination gives him advantage. How so? On this will be this article, on how this taking of an advantage delivers a greater opportunity for the oppressor.
I will sing a song to the Constitution before I proceed onto a next step: the demonstration.
Ah, The Constitution. A document fed by the heart of the first Mayflower settlers who have arrived to the rocky shores of Massachusets to practice their oppressed religion in peace. The document that has matured in the anals of time, was forged in the heat of experience of injustice and bitterness, and terrible oppression. All of that and more was put together into a coherent whole by our Founding Fathers who believed in the rights of men and in the sacred right of the self and its happiness. Life, Liberty, and The Pursuit of Happiness is what that vision and idea came down to us. People mock the "White male" but who else and in what country has envisioned such great ideals, such lofty pursuits and such freedom for women? Who has created a civilizations that is both encompassing and supreme in its works of art, music and humanity? Who else has created the Constitution, not to count France and its original form of government? It is barely the fault of these "white men" that the world at the time they've conceived a Constitution did not consider people of women-gender human beings. As for others, people of color, for example, not much could be blamed here. Although slavery is a terrble thing it was practiced across the world for thousands of years. I do see a connection between lowering a high creature such as a woman and enslabing one's own brother. Only the blind will fail to perceive the connection. Working with their time and the circumstances, the Founding Fathers took the concept of liberty and freedom a step further, and went where other have not gone before. The American Constitution is the pearl of Western Civilization. Of the Great Western Civilization. The civilization that gave rise to human rights, freedom for women, Red Cross, humanity for prisoners, no torture, help to other countries, acceptance and acknowledgement of homosexuals. The Enlightment, Molliere, Rousseau, Rembrandt all bequeathed its and their wisdom and insight.
People will start yelling at me with examples of how other countries are better especially when it comes to human rights. Really? Let's hear it, without the rebel-rousing. Did you know that in so wonderfully beloved lately Arabic countries, to name a few, women have no rights? NONE. The few countries in the region that allow some extent of humanity to women undergo sever attacks from other Muslim countries, thus indicating the popular belief that a woman does not possess her person, but is possessed by a man. The countries that are helping women to become more fully human are few and can be numbered, constituting an exception rather than the norm. The Muslims, people who differentiate themselves by religion they practice - Islam, read and revere Koran, their sacred book. In that book it states that women are secondary citizens. In different words than I have used, but the enumeration of women's rights and prohibition the men, MEN are supposed to instill, summarize to a conclusion: women are not humans and should be treated differently than regular humans, i.e. the men. Till this day in Iraq, women are made to carry objects like slaves walking with bags and stuff on them like mules, while their husbands languidly stroll by. These women share, no, not share -they have no choice but to have other women sleep with their husband and have kids with them. CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT ITS LIKE NOT TO HAVE A CHOICE? Well, you could imagine it. Just imagine men dictating you a right to abortion, men dictating you your dress code, men dictating you your behavior and you have come to the same wavelength the Muslim women live on. The only difference is that they are living at the very end of the fundamentalist perception of a woman and her role in reality. And you are living on the other end of the spectrum of the same wavelength. My point is, it is the SAME wavelength and it is created by men and not by you. It is false wherever and however you look at it. It is created to dissadvantage you, it is created to keep you down, it is created to allow you to be low and become lower. If you did not divorce yourself from your mind and logick and thought, you would have come to see this simple connectio nat ease. But considering your child level of the knowledge of the mathematics, logic, physics, chemistry and biology, I am not suprised you, of all people, oh woman, do not see. These poor Muslim women are illiterate (I have no idea why liberals try so hard to find counterexamples. By that their action they actually perpetuate the evil doing towards a woman on the part of a man, and create her a space out of which she will not be able to get out. After all, if there isn't anything wrong in the country where 90% of its women is enslaved at home so long as you could find even ONE counter example why worry, right? Wrong. You, the liberal female asshole is the one who undermines the people who are struggling to become free), at home all the time, made to bear children continuously, could be killed, mutilated or thrown out on the street without any consequence! They are dull and dumb, with no work allowed and no speaking out, a woman's life is cheap and till this day there are religious Muslim heads who give courses on how to beat your wife properly, in acordance with the law of Shariah. A Muslim man in many countries who kills his wife does not necessarily have to go to court. How can you overlook this, really now? These are facts. The word of a male is the law and people, innocent people whose only fault is of being of a female gender, die by thousands or decay away in the darkness of their home which these Muslim men try to present as "protection for women." Sure, protection, but against whom?!
As a Muslim man grows in his haughtiness and pride, his word is still enough to get a woman killed, to deprive her of all of her rights and to send her to her death. Why? How is this allowed? Because Muslim women have no recourse to any action, they are complete and utter slaves while you in this country, with all the means available to you sit on your assess and make your male laugh, you do not extend a hand in friendship to these people. And so, he gets away with literally, a murder. No one will punish him, and a woman has no protection before the law or in society. She is easier to get rid of than an ass.
And how about being a homosexual in other than US countries? Did you check your facts? In some countries homosexuals get killed, in others imprisoned. True, Islamic Oman imprisons women into drapes and kitchen slavery and then dresses young, twelve year old boys into women's clothing and has sexual itercouse with them, but as in representation of homosexual people for real, as real human beings, without an imprisonment and abuse of a female, that is rare.
And transexual people? The funny thing in that other ancient civilization seem to take a lead so far in this matter. Apparently recognizing that the division into two genders is artifical and allows for usurpation of force by one side that results in lack of development for the other side, complete with the lack of fulfillment and repression of normal and proper desires of both sides, people who recognized the natural complexity of both genders allowed for a balancing act of nature to take place. Such was the third sex, which arouse as a compromise betweeen the two horrific mutations patriarchy has been breeding for centuries now: male and female, is supposed to even out the tension and create a balance and harmony, and communication between the two genders. The male and female genders are artificial creations and create much unhappiness and misunderstandings. Deaths, beatings, no progress, lack of true drive are all the results of this abnormal distribution. Let us reckon on the arrangment that created the genders and what goes into maintaining them:
No women are born with make up and skirts and heels. True or not true?
All women have limbs, muscles, skin and hair. True or not true?
They have muscles, hair on legs and arm-pit hair, desires to dominate and control. True or not true?
No men are born wild, selfish or uncarring animals they have been turned into over centuries to fight and to rip things apart. This we can observe by watching children and boys before they get trained by the patriarchy.
No man is born without a heart or with a single thought of murder and mayhem. True or not true? Observe the works of art, humanity and truth.
There are many, many more examples on the subject but for now it will suffice to say that the worst enemy of the truth is, of course, The Patriarchy.
The creation of two genders and maintenance of the artificial lines is a creation of patriarchy and its greed. It is solely done for the enrichment of own pockets and with a design to get one over another. But the ancients knew the greed of the great ones of the world to be great, and so they saw that nature will rectify the situation to its best ability. The third gender, the transexuals, the brave enough people to embrace their sacred form and content, arrived to bring peace and harmony and to assist the evolution of people. They were always honored and respected. But when the angry bearded patriarchal god came, he banished all the other gods, and not unlike emperor, sat himself on the throne, and without the council of his equals and peers.
America, today, does recognize Trans-community and grants it rights. However, America expects its trannies to line up to get testosterone shots and top and botom surgiries. Todays patriarchy has a difficulty embracing the nature of a third gender in bodies created by nature. Many countries still consider Trans people sick, even worse than homosexuals. The anicent lore has been lost and repressed. The only way America will have its transsexuals is through councilling and operation table. Don't forget the T shots. Those who are and always will be are killed off most mercilessly. This is called...it does not have a name because this genocide of the Natural Transsexuals is simply not recognized...
So, us here, in America. Although offcially we all here have arrived at a place where we don't call gay people "faggot" and lesbians "carpet munchers", as well as we do not call the practioners of Santeria and Voodoo (both religions require animal sacrifice, check the facts for yourselves) animal killers (I am very impressed that animal lovers contain themselves and do not spill red paint on the practitioners, like they spill on innocent and silly Causacian and other women clad in furs. A strange thing indeed, a woman has a madatory dress code and is forced to wear jewelery, furs and heels to be respected and treated with semi-decency in many circles!)So we may say that we have evolved, if a little.
And so, officially, this here should be Haven. We all "love" diversity" and "support" it, don't we? Or do we not, after all? I mean, we are, after all respect each other's religious practices, nationalites and races as well as genders. That is all good - but the funny thing that at a closer examination these profestations don't seem to match the facts...There is an inconsitency, a behavior that contradicts the statements made by the same person. Under the surface there seem to be a different sets of beliefs operating. Beliefs that state that a Jew is a Kike, a Black person is a nigger, a woman - a slave and a whore, and nothing but a bitch, a gay person -an abomination, a practioner of a different Chrsitian denomination - a deviant devil worshipper, a transboi sick, sick, and once more, sick. So, what is REALLY going on?
Use your head. Does a tolerant, loving person who respects another's right to self-arising and asertion will put her on high heels and make it an unwritten rule to have a mask instead of a face? (Check out "Mirror Mask" some good references to the point.) And how about to term a healthy normal sexuality, confirmed to be normal and healthy by mother-nature (isn't sexuality a natural thing, not a civilized acquisition like a computer skill and a skill in caligraphy?) in women: promiscuity? And a woman practising it - a whore? Where in nature do you find reserve among females? It is a fundamental right to be promiscuous and mutli-partnered. For a female. She is the one to choose. She is the one to have a system that is set up to be able to find a proper mating potential. And bad things happen when we stand in the way of nature. Also, why would anybody in a human society care about owning woman's sexuality and a woman herself? What is there that is makes it somebody else's business to regulate another HUMAN BEING? Why even conceive of such a notion...Even animals don't do it, and they are sorely lacking a capacity to reason. You, the ones who attempt to regulate other human beings, however, have capacity for reason which you use to rationalize the abuse.
And tell me, what is it that speaks with a smile to someone and says: you are a transsexual, I understand that. Great. I will call you by the chosen name and support you. And a few days later conducts a major gay and transexual bashing, complete with a total annihilation of any and all rights of a female-bodied to self ascertion. When pressed hard for evidence for such claims (forget about a question why would he betray a friendhsip and his friend's trust in him and say such bad hurtful things), and for explanation a...religion surfaces! And no intelligent conversation arises: yes, this is what it says, and that is why women are supposed to be treated like sex- slaves and slaves in general. God said it so, you see. God has commanded to make you a slave. And science stood to justify it. And the society was created to keep you enslaved. Woman-slave. Woman=slave. Woman=woman=slave.
No, not even a single piece of "fact" given by that person who claims he has spoken to "god" to support his point. This person calls himself "god's man". This person turned around and betrayed his lover who was transitioning and turned agaisnt him/her. This person practices Hinduism, where transsexuality is so prominent yet he turns around and denies its existence! This person thinks he's "got it." This perosn hates transsexuals so much that even when he had an itnercouse with one and finished inside his asshole, he managed to insult him/her and call the transitioning boy terrible and awful names, this boi still rememebers. This tranny trusted this man who has called himself "god's man". This tranny watched this man violate his oath and take advatange of the youth, trust and love of this younger transitioning boi. This person hurt the boi in a thousand and one ways, and then even stroke against the boy's race! And nationality! This man says he loves god and god loves him. What kind of a god could love a man like that? What kind of a god could command such evils? What kind of a Hindu god hates transsexuals and their sacred expression and work?!
I asked for quotes from the godly man, but none were provided. Instead, he got angry and tried to "convince" me with hatred and anger. He even got up a few times from his seat and towered above me, indicating his might and therefore, his right... (Upon pressing to know how it is that we know it is a God, an angry response: he just is!). Only a singular sentence with a singular facial expression: this is right. Why? Comes the answer: because it is in the book. Silence. And in other books too, added after some hesitation....What books, why are they sacred, what about the contradicting evidence -nah...what for?
So, in many books it states that women are to be abused and mistreated. What interesting godly way! Ok, got it. But wait, no, it does not say "to be abused and mistreated." It says: to be kept at home. To be subservient. To bear children (want it or not.) To obey. To not think too much. To be making artificiality out of one's face and body. To be sexually passive and a willing slave at all times to feed and satisfy The Master's desires. To not have the voting rights. To be excluded from the goverment. To be hit and "disciplined." This must be a great treatment - so why then when the same actions are taken with other groups: blacks, jews, arabs, etc - the World Opinion screams in horror?
And this is because the underlying premises of a treatment that women receive are really bad and inhumane. How do we know? Well, we don't because we never venture to examine them. Very simple. If actions are the same, but are reacted to differently depending on which group is receiving them,we may only conclude that some groups are allowed to be abused. Because if it was not the case, the people would react the same to the same abuse. But they don't have the same reactions. And when a reaction diffes to the same actions, we may only conclude that the only difference is the group in question. Or time. Upon examing we observe that the time is the same for all treatments: slavery, women oppresion, persecution of jews have happened during the same time, across the continents. We cannot claim a difference in place, because it is "World Opinion" that I am discussing here, not an opinion of Kenya, Israel, Russia, America or Greece. So, when the same actions produce different results, we observe an inconsistency. And an inconsistency may either be a product of time or place or a group. Since time was eliminated, so was the place, the only factor remanining that could cotnribute to this difference, is a group. And when one group of people is allowed to be mistreated while another isn't, we observe double standards and discrimination of a specific sort. "Discrimination" is a preferential treatment of a person or a group. And the "preferential treatment" in this case is allowance of violence against one and dissallowance of violence against another. And since this is the case, and violence against one group is allowed to be perpetuated while the same violence against another group, isn't, we observe prejudice. Violence is something bad, and when it is allowed against one group of people but not allowed against another, we observe an inconsistency of upholding the abstract nature of the statement "violence is bad". The inconsistency states that although violence is bad, in some cases the exceptions can be made (All animals are created equal but some animals are more equal than others). And when there is an exception to an abstract absolute, irrational likes and dislikes are at play. These irrational likes and dislikes are termed "prejudices" and are defined as following: "Prejudice" is a type of discrimination that is not based on proper and relevant to selection factors but is based, instead, on factors that are based on personl likes and dislikes, and are at the end either diminishing or untrue of the value of a person or a group. And when an asbstract value of the violence is reduced to conditional and relative one, a set of prejudices is in operation. Why would anyone justify violence against women? How? How is it that the same violence against blacks or jews or foreighn nationals is not allowed? Why is it not allowed? Because "violence against people is bad, and especially violence beause of their skin color, race, nationality or religious belifs." And how is violence agaisnt women merits its existence? Since it is the same violence such as murder, mockings, mayhem, killings, rape, mental, physcial and emotional abuse as takes place agaisnt the aforementioned groups, it is abstractly the same. And it is overlooked or reduced to relativity, and therefore we can concluded the operation of prejudices in place. And a prejudice agaisnt a person because of their gender is unmerrited. Of course, is you state that women should be abused precisely because they are women, then, you, a member of a Anti-Female Ku-Klux-Klan should be justified.
And let us look again at the beauty of this inconsistency. An inconsistency, then, points to a inductive argument posing as an inductive one. Also we could say that behind the deductive profestations hides another argument that has a very set and marked criteria for women and other groups. An underlying system of beliefs that allows for a deductive argument not to be observed and skirted. And what is the implied argument in case of women abuse?
The argument is: these actions of abuse and violencce are ok so long as they are directed towards the females. When the same treatment is conducted against any other group but female group, the treatment is not ok and should not continue. And the truth of this can be observed when some groups make this argument against other groups: people scream "racism", "nationalism", and other "isms". Why do they scream? Because the abuse of people because of who they are is discrimination. Prejudice. Specific type of discrimination is prejudice and varieties of prejudices are racism, nationalism, sexism, religious persecution, mistreatment of dissabled people. But, regardless of the truth value of the above statements, somehow when the abuse is given to someone because she is a woman, the world does not object. Therefore the conlusion is, it is ok because she merits the abuse by the mere fact that she is a woman. The abuse that takes place against her person is because of her gender, and since it is silenced and allowed, the only conclusion to follow is that the abuse is ok. And because the same abuse is not allowed towards other groups, we conclude that teh abuse is allowed precisely because she is a woman. Either because of or because she is only. One states the sufficient and necessary reason for abuse a crirteria of being a female, another dismisses the claim of abuse on the grounds of a creature being insignificant enough to merit human treatement. Since abuse against groups is not allowed because it is inhumane because it is prejudiced and wrong to commit violence against a person because of who they are, the abuse of the same kind that is allowed against other group demonstrates the belief that the abused group is not human, and is therefore, not under a protection of concepts of "humanity, just, unjust, right and wrong." Therefore, pusuant to the laws of logic, common sense and mathematical precision, we follow to conclude that women are either not human or not considered human to merit proper and human treatment.
Now, to solidify this conclusion made in the abstract and in deductive framework, we can look around the world for the conclusion in experience, and in an inferential framework. In many countries women are considered to be secondary human beings. It is an official stand, not my conclusion. Books of Torah Bible, Koran, and many more do not suggest it, they openly state it. You would think that it is ridiculous? No, really. By the way, to state that a woman is "not human" is invalid. Homo Sapiens is a biological genus, known amongst lay people as "human". A species of animals that is, specifically - mammals. Amoebas, by the way, don't have a sex difference, but a species of mammals do and contain two genders. Female and male. Therefore, a woman - as defined by Oxford's dictionary is an "adult female human being". Homo Sapiens is human species.
So, what is going on, for God's sake? Do these people not know logic? Do people who abuse women and promote their abuse unaware of the simple biological fact? Are they dark and uneducated? Doubtfully. Those who make the arguments and conduct the treatment are highly educated and smart people with much success and good credit. They are exceptionally smart and well rounded creatures.
So, what is it that makes a friend say "I accept you" and then find subtle ways - hurful words, threats of removal of favor, mockery, etc. to try to "change you?" What makes smart, educated people versed in literature and mathematics make simplistic unsupported by logical conclusions arguments that are directed towards hate? What makes the employers nod to the employee's protective laws, while ensuring that only certain national or racial group of women, looking a certain way will work in available positions? What makes people to affirm the right and the natural, ancient existence of a transsexual, to only turn around and bash and bash until the person complies, like a Jew under Nazi regime with ghetto regulations and a yellow star? Actually, maybe more like a Protestant in France at the beginning of a reign of Queen Margo, or a Christian under Roman empire before it converted to Christianity. Providing you will change your "religion," you will live. "Religion" in our case being a person's biological, chemical, psychic, mental and self tendencies to an expression and a way of being. Basically, the person has to STOP BEING AND BECOME SOMEONE ELSE to live. These people take it upon themselves to command a human person and being.
What is that driving force behind open consent with the right of individuals and a secret but persistent practice against them, a practice that is against reason and is irrational: persecution by prejudice. And as we know, nothing feeds it best as old time religions. We are required to worship god that wipes out cities and states, commands to kill "women and children" in one case, everyone but the children" in another, "everyone except for virgin females" in a third. Sometimes it is the whole population "god" desires. Sometimes it is a minor trangression or an innocent question one asks that ensures terrible and severe punishments on the part of "merciful" lord. The punishments like a loyal servant who left his inheritance as a prince of Egypt and followed the Lord's word all his life living in tents and half hungry has received: denied the right to enter the "milk and honey" land of Israel. Bound to watch it from a distance. Bound to die away from it. And how about god who commands to be merciful and loving and gets tribes and nations erased in his name? And what about an alien descending upon earth and engaging in frivolous sexual actvity with cowherd girls, calling it "pure love," claiming titles and commanding love and obeyascence to him, a constant worship and mandatory perception of every relationship as the sexual one, with him? When people command us to do that in these terms, we call them selfish, or a prick, or childish. A behavior of a "god" is somehow different? Who and what makes him god? He surely does not act like one! Power is not godliness, by that definition Nazis and war mongers are gods too. It is a rationalization by the people that allows this shit to persevere. People, stop being superstitious and get educated.
So, once again now together: why is this behavior allowed? Because it comes from a god! And why is he god? Because he says so. And how do we know that his word is true? Why? ? Because he is God, you stupid! !
So, these "gods" command us to hate women and to destroy others who do not practice our religions.
Ku Klus Klan commands us to hate blacks.
Nazis commanded to hate Jews.
Some government will command us to spy on one another and to betray friends, lovers and neighbors.
Why do I even have to bring other groups in to demonstrate a point of abuse being bad?
Why is it to say "to hate women" is not enough somehow?
What have a long suffering group of people who have patiently bore all abuse, all children, hard house work, ungrateful and unrewarded housework, work in the fields, undesired sexual acts forced upon their person, angry fists, underserved mockings and beatings, lack of representation, lack of education, dehumanization, demonization for centuries need to be contrasted with another group to get the point across?
Why is it that to use religion as one's banner to justify abuse of these innocent people who are severely disadvantaged so that life could go on (the presence of a womb and the subsequent vulnerability) is sufficient to rally large numbers of people behind it?
Why when the evidence of women abuse comes out, the religion is not disqualified from the human community but when a racial discrimination comes out, it is disqualified?
Women constitute more than half of human population as it stands now. It is a half without which the creation process cannot go on. And why must they justify their existence with utility? What happened to intrinsic value attributed to a human life? Why always in words but never in action the value of a human life is supported? When it comes to a "woman" that is.
And transsexual? Especially the one in a female body? Openly supported, of course. Why the hate to the race ancient and acknowledged by Native Americans, Indians (Shiva's favorite represenation is a hermaphrodite: literally half man, half woman: Ardhanarishvra. ), among African tribes, in Assyria, Samaria, Mesopatamia, Phoenicia, Nordic beliefs, Greece? Why is feminity in a man is widely defended, whereas a masculinity in a woman is never even attempted to be understood? Why unreasonable expectations: a man may desire to resemble a woman, and in that imitate and act as it is traditional of women, whereas a woman wanting to resemble a man and taking steps to bring this into reality, is widely censured. Observe the ridiculousness of the situation. A gay man is expected to be a little feminine, a but a lesbian woman must still look straight? Always? She is given a look and a form from outside, by the boys? Where is the logic? It makes no sense. In other words: nonsense. That type of a man and a woman would be going in the opposite directions, from their assigned gender role and each other. Man will go towards feminine, and woman will go towards masculine. But somehow she is still made to stay at the feminine spectrum.
Why?
Who regulates?
What business anyone has regulating another human being in a democracy? What other group do we know of that regulates other people's lives: their nutrition, dress code, activites, income, thoughts, being, expression? No, not children, although it is a good one. I should ad: made work double and get paid less, made give out ideas, accomplishements, support, favors, is not in command of her own sexual urges but must service them out at demand (regulated by ladder standing association), produce children without regards to own desire, and put up with abusive words and behavior with a smile and obedience? Right. Now you got it. There are people who got treated similarly and are found in history book, who were in this country submitted to this kind of treatement. In fact, this country still can't live down the shame of only 200 years or so. You've read in your history books about slave-owners. Slavery.
So, the religion is apparently only one means of expressing a driving desire for slaves and power over other people. People that don't have a religion also practice that attitude. What is it? What it the denial of personality, intricacy, body rights, self rights, mind, intellect, soul, artistic creativity and hopes and dreams? It is the people who are used to slavery, rely on slavery, love slaves and will conjure any "god" in support of that "law" that will justify and rationalize slave ownership. Ok, it is female only who they own completely. But how completely and how prolific. How abundant. How absolutely unpunishible behavior one could display. How many varieties in benefiting oneself at a minumum expense.
Each woman is expected to like the same.
To think the same.
To want the same.
To respond the same.
To laugh the same.
To cry the same.
Actually, these are androidal slaves.
Real slaves were abused and called "lesser humans" or inhuman. Their reactions were ignored or laughed at, whereas with "women" the normal reactions are not even expected. The standard response is expected. The standard response is produced. And for difference in response, for a reaction that is own and independent, one gets punished, oh how one gets punished and with such cruelty.
Transexuals? When can we feel our bodies, our love, our self expressions? The female body is not self owned, it is inhabited with the concepts and ideas of a man. Of the men. Everything, including what one should think, how one should act, how one should respond is mapped out and directed by the men for women. Now imagine a waking consciousness of a woman.
************************************************************************************
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
************************************************************************************
Consciousness that wakes up to a
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
brick wall of dresses, make up, heels, no opportunities, no way of self expression without terrible judgment and punishment, no way to make money decently, no way to develop the skills. That consciousness has one choice only: to be and feel a guy. Now, imagine consciousness that screams "I am a guy" in a body that is battered and abused and denied, and you got yourself a recipe for a suicide or a bloody murder. No, still can't see? Of course, hate and irrationality are draped over your eyes, take the drape off and take out the ear plugs.
Why get angry though at what you have created and with your ignorance and cruelty allowed to become twisted and corrupted?
Why spit on transsexuals who already are and partially as sick as we are today, are a result of your work and your effort to destroy people's genome and selves?
We are a product of your work, daddy. Don't you love us? Or will you smite us? Again? And again? And again? Until the screams will resound in your ears day after day and night after night until we drive you so crazy, so crazy that you will split your own cranium in search of relief, you baby swallowing Cronos. ... inside your head, that like Athens we will break out of it, with Metis under our arm, unconscious, but alive? What's up, now?
Do your research and check the evidence. Historical. Biological. Scientific. Spiritual. Psychic. Astral. Own. Self. Other person is telling you, goddmanit!
"Friends" who "accept." "Accept." God bless you all, that God that is above and beyond all these squables and economics, and may she/he/it/them preserve you from "friends" who sneakily attempt to "heal" you or to kill you worst comes to worst.
You sicko, I accept you.
You know...