Unsafe New Yor: Part Nine A

"WHAT DO YOU MEAN YOU THINK THIS: THIS IS HOW YOU SHOULD THINK"

Amazing! Nothing apparently gets some people more upset than you thinking from your own head. People try to "convince" that you really should look and dress some other way. At a closer examination, they don't really directly benifit from it or do they do? Now why would a person close to you fully aware of your process of thinking and personality and person suggest to act a way completely opposite to who you are? Who makes him, in a democracy, an arbitrator of people's tastes and behaviors? Why is varietry allowed among men but all women have to be sexual xreatures in mini dresses with make up? Why do they have to be naked? Why do they have to expose their bodies? Why are they called names when they want to assert who they are and their persons? Why no listening is given and obstructions are placed? How can anyone regulate a person's PERSON and deny practising SLAVERY? Why is an arbitrary standard, based on one's perception made into THE STANDARD? Why woman's body is abhored the wya it is? Why is there a sens of ENTITLMENT to her obedience and "change"? An adult, fully mature individual has tastes, preferences, liks and dislikes and should be either taken as is or not at all. "Changing" preaching or yelling at - how often it happened to women! They, even in their THIRTEES are still treated as children or pests? Ridiculous!
Why when you say "hey that was wrong to do to me" the person starts infliciting more pain and going off on a tangent? Why human standards are not applied to women? What is it that a sexual appearance devoid of thinking being inside necessary? Simple answer: conduction and promotion of one's goal. A woman is a means to an end. reduced to perceptory function and "dressed-to-impress" she is stimulating men's sexual energy and then processing what arises in herself, constantly being in a state of perceiving, producing novel connections and new ideas, and seeing with her long range vision (developed out of centuries of abuse and looking out for her life unde cruel and capricious monsters-masters) all potential obstacles. She can have no life of her own - statically pressed in a tutu on high heels with masked face and an ass sticking out in the air, she is a sight that makes even gods - cry. HOW CAN THEY, would a visitor from another plante ask observing the travesty. THIS ARE THEIR OWN SISTERS! THEIR OWN KIND. Oh, but they can, friend. They can this and much, much more. Of the two of us now, who, by concluded out of premises definitions is NOT HUMAN?
Till soon
PS Consider also how many adult fucntions are developed in "women." What is promoted and what is suppressed. Physical development is non-existent: a primary place where you exist is your...body! Self awareness? Self knowledge? Tutu and heels are not integral part of your personality nor your person. Then, when a "woman" displays an understandable lack of knowledge in the fields she was not trained in, she is mocked, abused and presented as "stupid." If I am discouraged from the childhood to study math (and trust me, in tmy case it is truth. And I have father who is a mathematician. Luckily for me, I always loved math and continue my studies in it.) and then a situation with mathematical ability required arises. How will the one without background and training know how to solve it? Thus is self fulfilling prophecy of "woman is stupid but pretty" arises. A "woman", friend, is Homo Sapiens whom if you teach instead of training her as Homo Spaniels, maybe will be different? How many colleges are observing that women lead men in thier grades and progress? Boys are failing the classes and not learning whereas girls are. Why must I say it and wait for an argument to have someone
"proove" me I really am inferior when apparently I am not? Also, if I was black, would you dare, even if you were a terrbile racist, say to me"you're inferior"? AND WHY NOT NOW? My gender is a lot more primary to species definition than race, color etc. These aree secondary to gender.