BUT WOMEN ARE WORSE THAN MEN IN X,YZ, THEREFORE LET MEN DECIDE
OR AN UNBEATABLE LOGIC
Working of the heading: it's a falacy.
"Worse" is a comparison. Worse than. "Worse" does not mean "bad" although in the heads of many people 3=4. A term of comparison to becomes a term itself. Big difference. Huge. Now, when we compare something, just like in simple mathematic class proverbial apples and oranges do not ad: what do you get when you ad them? Orgepple?!...Really now. Only things same in basic structure can be added together. I cannot compare a college grad in philosophy to a basement dwelling 14 hours a day and 6 day a week working person with no previous background in a study of philosophy who has found somewhere a book of Plato's dialogues and reads it in the bathroom at nights before crashing herself or himself to sleep. I cannot say: oh, the college grad is better. It is obvious. She is better in philosophy. Furtherwmore, I cannot proceed to conclude that the basement person who works 14 hours and has no education is "stupid" because of that. That is called a stretch. When comparing objects, basic structure is a criteria. With humans things are a bit more complex. Education, nutrition, background, opportunites all count. Looking historically, women are not physically trained, nor encouraged to develop selves. They are defficient over centuries in the areas of knowledge and development. So, how can they be "compared" with men who have huge accumulation of knowledge in their genetic code by now? Also, I hear often people say: well, but women are slower, and not good in technology and if we have to listen to them where are we going to get.
First of all who is the "we." We - women, comprise more than half of human population, you cannot be speaking on behalf of "us" here. Because where are "we" - maltreated, uneducated, underpaid and extremely without any traces of self-esteem and self-respect would like to be going?! Where does a sick person want to go? And what does a hungry person want to do? And what the abused person wishes for? Also, where is it that we "have to get?"
We are living, buddy.
There is no agenda.
And if there is, "we" should have been respected, treated well and taught, then "we" could have considered. Also, as I said, agenda should be decided between the entire species: we.
The Homo Sapiens: females+males decide on the agenda.
"We" here have basic needs to be met.
"We" here are not working horses.
"We" here may not even find the "agenda" proper.
"You" are going to use might?
