Vocabulary is a depository of knowledge, codified as "words" and preserved for us by earnest and knowledgeable people who compose vocabularies. Vocabulary is like a small library, but not of books, but of words. Fundamental building blocks of speech, words are a key to the proper or impoper usage of language. Knowledge of the meaning of words or the abscence of thereof can produce miscommunication or a relation of souls. When early people in Niniveh attempted to build a tower that would take them to the heights of God her/himself, they were prevented from doing so by God through separating them by language. Without a common tongue, people quarreled, miscommunicated and finally, soon enough, abandoned the project and all attempts at it. But the dictionary meaning of words is not the only meaning we will have to know. People, often, out of a lack of education or a specific intention, use the words in a meaning other than it was intended by the builders of the language. If not aware of that sepcific, we, the heares, could find ourself in a strange land where our consciousness will become confused. "Connotation" means the meaning that culture, civilization or a particular demographic imprinted upon a particular word. Often that second meaning stems from motiffs, and often selfish ones. People could use a rather neutral word in a rather aggressive way with an intention to hurt your feelings, and if used by sufficient number of people over a long enough period of time, the word will acquire that second meaning and perhaps the people will even forget the first. Below are some examples of the words used thusly improperly, with a double meaning that is intended to hurt and miscommunicate for the sake of own selfish motiff. Not every connotation is a bad one and sometimes rather a product of natural human development and discoveries that were not yet made when the word was originally created. And so, with a little diversion onto the real meaning of the word so improperly used today, I present to you a "Quck Vocabulary Builder".
Judgment: discretion. Observing a difference between the two pr more objects. Concluding something or the other based on a standard or criteria or/and information provided. Ability to differentiate between concepts, things, qualties. An act of differentiation.
Judgement. Today I cannot think of a word that sends more people into shock, much more than a story of young Nixzmary repeatedly abused and killed in her basement by her own parents ever did. "Judgement" seems to be out of favor. "Do not judge," "just don't judge," and "are you judging me" all became a form of accusation or an attmept to call upon misbehavior in a person. Everybody knows that the one who judges is "bad" and the one who does not is "good." Let's see now, let us take a look at the world without judgement.
In a world without judgement humans will die out like flies. They will get food poisoning, get mutialated by wild animals and won't make those stock market sales. They will mate indiscriminatorily and bear children if any survive. Because in the world without judgement mothers will go on drinking and smoking and stressing themselves out, which of course will affect the fetus. In the world without judgement many mothers will die with their young children. For fathers will run off. In the world without judgement a new man in a woman's life can kill her child from the previous marriage or association. In that world passing grad is failing and failing is passing. To know how to read and write is the same as not to know. In the world without judgement prices can go up everyday and salaries get cut. People can get fired left and right and no one can do anything - because there is no judgement. In the world without judgement there is no law. Because to apply the law is to judge. Because law without application is a dead letter. Only an action of judgement can activate it. The Law is a passive thing, laied out to be observed. But just like there are three brances of goverment, there are three brances of the law. First is the legislative - law itself. Then there is executive - making actions. Then there is judiciary, judging these actions in relation to the laws and concluding them to be either proper or improper, legal or illegal. Let us now look at the meaning of the word "judge" and "judgement."
The original meaning of the word "judge" is this (acording to Oxford dictionary): n.supreme arbiter, public officer with authority to hear and decide cases in a law court, person who decides contest, competition, dispute.
V. act as a judge, hear and try in the law court, give a decision.
"Judgement" is: judging or being judged, decesion of a judge of a court.
Interesting. What does this word have to do with everyday people? Why do people get so angry and scream out: "don't judge!" Apparently unless you are a "public officer with authority" or a " supreme arbiter" you, by definition cannot conduct "judgement. Doubtlfully people that know you for a while can make a mistake and assume you to be a closeted court offcial. So what could they possible mean? Let's see. What does the word "judgement" come from" What does a judge do that your friends ( for we have concluded they cannot possibly not want you to conduct your duty if such it was under the condition you were a judge by definiton) do not want you to do?
What does a "public authority" do when it "hears and decides cases? What are "cases" after all?
Case: legal quesion to be decided in the court of law.
What is a court of law?
What is law?
Law:rule made by authority for the proper regualtion of a community or society or for a correct conduct of life. Aha.
So, laws are regulations of sorts. For maintenance of certain standard either in community or personal life. When a question about propriety arises and parties cannot seem to agree, it is believed that a third person with a superior learning and knowledge (that is why she or he is given authority over others. Not because people like to be bossed around. To serve the people.Original intent of the people who compose the community) will be able to see more clearly and decide upon a correct conduct. "Decide" seems to be the key word. What does "decide" mean?
Decide:settle a question or doubt, think about and come to a conclusion.
So, the judge thinks and comes to a conlusion. And what is "think?"
Think:use, exercise the mind in order to form an opinion, come to conclusions, examine, consider, take into account.
So a thinking person uses mind to look at things. Then, she or he decide. And what things do they look at? If the case is about murder, does a judge consider the price of the toaster in an online store? Or is the case is a dispute over property of two divorcing individuals, does a judge consider the repurcussions of an irrepsonsible restaurant owner who has poisoned his customers because the food regualtions were not observed? If the judge does, then boy we are in trouble.
So, the judge obviously thinks about the case. In case of tennant-landlord, the judge looks at the living arrangements, the lease, the rent pais or unpaid, safety and otehr conditions met by the landlord. If the case is about stolen bike, the judge will look at the evidence presented against the thief. If the case is about physical abuse the judge will look at the severity and consider laws regulating that aspect.
So a judge uses a DISCRIMINATION.
Discrimination: to make, see difference between; make distinctions.
The judge discriminates the cases and decides by thinking about them, coming up to a conclusion.
So, maybe people that tell you not to" judge" really mean that they do no want you to see with differentiation, a discrimination their behavior, and think about it in relation to a standard, or a law of sorts and decide something about them or their behavior. And why not? Are they 5 year old children where anything they do is adorable babble and cute tooshie? A 5 year old can shit on the floor and we'll understand. Though not actually at 5. 2 maybe. A 10 year old may be rude enough to comment on your pimple or to beg a guest for money. A teenager slams doors and screams "I hate you," an elder person may hit you with a stick because you brought them a wrong slice of toast. But these people are not adults. They are subject to different "laws." Based on their age - because biology has something to do with this. A child's mind is yet undeveloped and she or he is unable to DISCRIMINATE between polite and impolite. An older person's mind is afflicted by age, there is such fact as aging, and she or he does not control his or her impulses.
So, discrimination of behavior. Why can you not "judge" them? Why if somthing appears to be doubtfully proper social behavior in relation to YOU and you feel either insulted or hurt or even abused can you not use your own mind to think, to examine the facts of your friend's behavior and using a standard applied to the situation and your own feelings decide, discriminating between instances and facts, if what he said or done to you was not proper? "You don't know!" screams your friend. Of course you don't until you think about it. And human civilization, thank God is old and has many instances recorded, many human personalites outlined in literature, much development to be offered through music and art. Human mind capable of creating legal systems, technology and dreams that engender Geneva convention and equal opportunity amendment, and civil rights movement is surely capable of evolving, and learning, and making proper to the situation discriminations that would lead to a good, solid judgement. And, human beings are neither red carpets for anyone to tread upon nor stepping stones. They are not garbage refuse where anything can be dumped. Even that is not possible today: there is recycling. So why would a human being be less discriminatory than a deer than would not just mate with anyone, and a cat that would not just be petted by anyone? Must we mate indiscrimatorily? Must we be petted indiscrimatorily? Ans since cats and deers do not have spoken language, and complex systems of mathematics, music, art and literature, not any we could see, they may not require a "judgement" of people's characters and persons. A cat may not care how you look at her. A dog may not pay attention if you call it bad names in a sweet voice. But to humans words mean things. Also, living in society there are certain expectations relied on from both sides, and certain human unspoken uderstandings that we as species have accumulatd over thousands and thousands of years of evolution and selection. Of course we need to examine them once in a while. But a person who is genuine and wants change will not prevent others from examing her or his actions and words, in fear. They want change, and therefore aim for the truth. If mistake has been made on their part, they cannot arrive at the truth, therefore they will allow the examination. But who would be afraid of it? The ones who aim for the truth? Or the ones that fear something from your "judgement"? And why? IFthey are afraid you will judge incorrectly, that's understandble. But that is why there is communication and verbal and logical structure. But under the analysis with proper tools all falsity will come out. Therefore, buddy, do not judge!!!
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
Here is a vocabulary to demonstrate that the things that are bad become things that are good if thrown a different light on and the opposition is suppressed. This is a main tool of bad and low people who give their crimes a high name, their vices – sense of glory and their abuse of developing people who need their protection, a name of liberators.
The terms listed below are terms used by patriarchy to glorify its misdeeds and to shame a woman into putting up resistance with their abuse.
The vocabulary can be broke down by the lines by which it is used in real life. Bad intention. Preparation of the ground for conduction of acts of murder, thievery and abuse, tools of preparation, suppression of the opposition during the time of preparation, suppression of the opposition during the time of abuse, abuse itself, conditions set up for abuse to be ignored, conditions set up for abuse to be overlooked if seen, conditions set up for abuse to be tolerated, conditions set up for abuse to be accepted, conditions set up to change abuse into good thing, abuse being changed into a good thing, abused and suppressed people presented as winning, passage of time, abused people become indentured slaves, serfs, complete slaves, domestic animals.
Whore: a woman of independent thought and action, who not always engages in freely chosen consensual sexual activity. Used by patriarchy in times of anger at frustration at not having gotten one’s way.
Slut: a woman of independent thought and action who is known to have engaged in sexual activity at some point in her life, at her own consent and at her own choosing. Used by patriarchy as a means of preventing the growth of this person’s influence and mind development. Often is a way to cut the person out of conversation, win a point in an argument and destroy the validity of that woman’s point.
Cunt: a woman of mean and annoying character, who is at fault for having a vagina: a.k.a “cunt”. Used by patriarchy at moments of frustration and lack of knowledge to that woman’s sexual endeavors. When she cannot be accused of having had sex, she can still be accused of having a “pussy” – a vagina. That is most despicable on her part and she should be put in her place when she attempts to become anything more than a sex and kitchen breeding slave.
Man: a superior and godlike being given powers of life and death over woman. He is to be respected at all times, obeyed and served. No woman can know greater happiness than in serving him, her master.
Woman: a necessary evil. A secondary species of a human race by many not even considered human. She is an animal with whom men mate and produce male children. Female children are not “children” but little female of the species of the Homo Sapiens animals. It is unfortunate when a man has many little animals. It is embrassing. A woman exist to cook, clean, give birth and serve her master and commander: the man. She must gets trained properly lest the evolutionary growth will take place in her and render her aware to the fact that she is actually a human being.
Love: a narcotic given to lower males and all females to ensure the procreation of the race. It eases the pain of these very low animals – women, and make them willingly stop their own development and evolution. The drug is extremely addictive but effective: women are known to have done fits of Herculean labor on it.
Education: kitchen, church and nursery for women. College, sports, languages, mastery and evolution for men.
Work: life activity based on one’s expertise and accomplishments for men, life activity based on what’s left after men have shopped around for women. For women criteria of expertise lies in: sexy dress, enticement, enhancement of the man. Any sign of activity or accomplishment on the part of a woman should be and will be punished by termination and further persistent effort to become better and proficient will not help a woman to enter the work force as an independent and equal contractor but will reduce her employment opportunities because of her reputation for being self assertive and free. Only female SLAVES can have jobs, free women are an anomally and should not be allowed to perpetuate.
Freedom: a recognition of a man as an equal participant in a society with a right to live and express himself, and for a woman it means freedom to choose to assent or dissent to an act of sexual penetration.
Equality: all men are created equal. All women are equally allowed to compete for a male by utilizing the available means of seduction.
Children: workforce or sex force.
God: an ultimate version of a patriarchal authority designed to appease protesting against unfair labor and fighting masses of males, a unalterable decree for women to kept reproducing and obeying the master, the man. A great preventive of questioning the status quo and a possible evolution.
Diversity: a concept to appease the growing majority of slaves and degenerates. Used through forcing women of the tribe to sell out their bodies or time to these slaves. The belief in this “diversity” is fostered only in women’s mind until she comes to believe nd practice an attitude of amoebic non-discretion towards anyone and anything. Her person, her property, her time must become a property of the lave population lest the rebellion erupts. It is like loosing a pawn to protect oneself from loosing a Bishop or a Queen.
