Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Unsafe New York: Part Fourteen

"COME THEE OH MEN, DICTATE ME MY DESTINY"
Have you ever wondered why is it that women allow every Joe-Scmoe to dictate them what is the right way to behave and to look? An ancient left-over psyche perception from the times a life of a woman was completely in the hands of a man (be it her father who could throw an unwanted baby girl child into a river (India), command her mother to bind her feet to make her attractive and a sellable commodity (China) or to deprive her of any expression and defense (Islamic countries)), her husband who would place things on her to be carried like its still done in Iraq (info courtesy of a Marine), and her son who deny a claim that certain religions and mind states are more conductive to sexism and womben abuse than others but it is mostly because of a prevalent mind state that to see the truth and say it would render you: racist, nationalist, or any other than sexist, -st. Read "Unsafe New York: Part Thirteen."
The funny thing that is pretty much NOT ok to be any -ist today, besides a sexist. When you protest the sexism you are suddenly a racist, a nationalist and many other ists. Even women themselves seem to side with the abusers, so strong is the history of divestment from the self. I still remember a time when a man I considered most the important part of my life betrayed me. He did it at a reading group that was superbly important to me because of it being my first reading group. This was a group where my talent was acknowledged and where my inclinations hatched, it was led by a prominent womban and a writer, and the guy was invited by me (and to this there was much objection because apparently he had a reputation for being a troublemaker, and this woman could barely stomach him, but the eye of love is a blind one). In that group, after I have issued him an invitation with such a difficulty, he got up and loudly and clearly read that he is a "misogynist, and proud of it." The whole story he read was about bashing women, more women and more women. Why? I helped him as much as I could before, the lady kindly listened to his garbage, and he was living in an apartment with a womban older and self sufficient, who was kind to him and kept him largely out of good will and mercy. He lived off womben all his life, and now instead of gratitude he publically embrassed me in front of what could have been my group and my friends. And I, whose hand he held and whose mouth he kissed, was a woman...And then he looked me in the eye as if it was ok? And smiled? And sat down to chat with me? I was in love, and I still love him. I will never stop loving you, you know that, but this is not because you are a bad person. You and I are a sad but old story. But that day, he just stated that basically not only he hates me, but my entire kind! When one nation says that to another and attempts to implement measures to destroy the hated group, we call it GENOCIDE. And "a nation" consist of both men and women, but sexism and misogyny is not funny: it is highly profiled actions and propaganda of hatred, directed specifically towards a weaker, more dependent and innocent part of humanity. On a personal level, by the way, such targeted discrimination is called "scape goating". And why?
But I digress, back to man commanding woman's life. To repeat, in her youth, it is her father. Later, it is her husband. Later yet, it is her son who commands and orders her life. (In Japan, by the way, a woman dares not to lift her head; in India: a widow must throw herself into a funeral pyre. ALIVE) Not only Europe and Western countries are the most enlightened by now on affairs of gender relationships, they are the countries that have inherited the herritage of Greece, on which all we do and think today, is based. Logic is a child of philosophy, a major Greek pursuit. Like any science, it has rules. These rules command our thinking and behavior, but women are not only not taught logic or mathematics, on which philosophy eventually builds, they are made to dislike it through subtle suggestions such as: chicks are not good at math, women are better at humanitarian subjects, math women are not sexy, logic isn't fun...They (the women) are discouraged and this is done by making smart and talented women appear unlikable and to be avoided at all costs. Mostly this information is false, it is untrue but becomes a self fulfilling prophecy where women do come to believe themselves to be helpless and stupid. Since logic is not abolished because of some group not knowing it and therefore not being able to recognize it, men vastly continue to use it building up vast empires and subjecting a large number of people who are women and men as well. Your lack of knowledge will not undo the eddifice of knowledge only will make you weaker and vulnerable against those who use it. Women thus become easy victims of society. A way to control woman's behavior and to mold her in accordance to one's subjective standard is easy: apply a logical fallacy "Subjectivity".
A specific example of that fallacy in action would be woman's leg hair. A hairy woman is presented as a beast, a man, an anathema. A famous line is: oh my God you have leg hair, you are a guy. Where is the fallacy? Right here.
Homo Sapiens being an ANIMAL SPECIES consist of biological and gender specifics. "NATURAL: is BY DEFINITION whatever present in an original state without adjustments and changes made by humans or the entity. NATURALLY, a womban has leg hair. To check the truth of this statement, do not shave for some time and observe. You do not need to take testosterone, it grows by itself. Only no one dares to grow it out without an excuse of testosterone because most women have come to completely associate with the image of a woman imposed upon them. Also, without even this experiment, follow through logically the fact of your biology and understand that hair is not a gender thing, but a species thing. Now, if women did not have hair, neither the shaving creams nor razors would exist. But they do. A proof from reality. Furthermore, if a woman has hair on her legs at birth, it is natural. If she has a womb, she is a woman, a female of the species by definition. If she is a female of the species, yet has hair on her legs at birth, she is naturally hairy. Therefore, it is natural for a woman to have leg hair and does not render her "male." The catch is in improper associations. The attempt here is to present man's desired reality: helpless and hairless chichuahua for a human woman for reality proper. That idea to him is more real than the reality of a woman: he sees her AFTER the shaving, and therefore to him, by a logical fallacy of taking wished reality for a real reality the presence of hair on her body is a sign of non-reality. He uses that system of societal censure to present a normal woman as stupid, ugly -if she does not comply with his wishful thinking. The woman is also shamed for not being "natural" (read: the schizophrenic reality of a guy). So a woman shaves in quiet shame, blaming herself for having hair, because apparently a "REALY WOMAN" does not have it...
This is only one example of a wonderful patriarchal tool kit filled with: logical fallacies, improper analysis, fear and intimidation, coercion and violation of self will, dire hatred and simple lack of education, culture and patience, false analogies, contradictions.
To be continued...
PS A prevalent tendency to judge something instanteneously, as many could judge this article as "feminist" without giving their brains work to read it and to understand it, is yet another tool. Once thus judged, women will stand back in awe and fear of a male "authority" and shaking like leaves, mostly subconsciously, from soicetal condemnation will continue to comply.
YOU ARE SOCIETY, STUPID.

Unsafe New York: Part Thirteen

"I KNOW, I KNOW"
Why is it that today, people already "know everything" the moment they've met you? The "aha" look is so prevalent nowadays, I find it quite curious. Quite, quite. You noticed, you only have to utter something, and people have already "got you." Often, they don't let you finish your sentence and finish it for you. Often, you are left to deal with a scizophrenic behavior that is not warranted by a set of facts and circumstances presented. What is it then? A politIcs of victimhood and a propagated sense of entitlement towards resources, people and ideas one has no "entitlement" for. There is also a propagated through apparent "denial" stereotypes, especially sexist.
In the first case, people read into your body language and your tone. Now the media and the whatever has brought to be paired within it by people not unlike Maslovian specialist become the "reality" for those who have been trained like dogs to first learn the clues and then, respond to them. A certain gesture with a certain meaning. A certain behavior. A certain way of conversation. A variety is of a merchant kind: not great but prolific. So, a nod to the left means: racist. A nod to the right means: nationalist. A look straight in the eyes means: challenge. Lots of times the pairing is not only incorrect, it is deliberately made to be associated with ideas and beliefs already proclaimed as "bad." Often, these "bad" beliefs don't ever see the light of reason and true analysis, but are blanketly made to be so by some "authority". Often, fear is used to make people "understand" that that belief is bad. When the noise and manipulation settles down, people either don't remember why the belief is bad or the existing power structure has become so embedded and powerful, that they would prefer to forget all that existed before hand, and consider things from a point of view of the existing view. That is why America is such a blessed Constitutional Democracy and thankfully the Soviet Regime has fallen. It was a wide practise in the ex Republic to ehnace its stand via propaganda and cracking of the whip. If your belief in the system got shaken, you were instantly propted up by fear, threat, actual punishment, or vodka.
So, the "beliefs" being embedded into the people's minds as the "right ones" all that remains is to pair them up with certain undesirable physical behaviors and appearances. That is how people start looking and acting like one another and in accordance to the original type, manufactured and created for the purposes of whatever. When a purchase of make up or a brutal and degrading practice of hair removal becomes more important on the measure of your values than The Constitutional right of Free Speech or Habeas Corpus, everyone is in trouble. There is no mental or any other growth in a system that prohibits free thinking by imposing premade ideas via the technique of spreading the beliefs, labelling them and then associating them in your mind for you. It is your job to know why a and b are bad or good. It is also incumbent upon you to recognize the individuality and not hate your fellow human being so much that you would want or think the worst of him or her.
Take me, for example. Yes, I am "white." A most idiotic term because my skin is a yellowish peach hue. I am from Azerbaijan, Russian-Jewish decent. What does any of the racist crap has to do with me? But a day does not go by that I don't receive looks from people. Black men and women, and even children. I am sensitive. I am an artist. And I like my head shaved. Why is it that I have to go around explaining either openly or subtly that my head is shaved not because I belong to Nazi youth, but because I like it? Must I open my chest and rip out my heart to tell you why? Why? Who are you? What do I owe you? You owe me, for unjustly discriminating against people that not only recognized you, intermarried with you, but have NOTHING to do with you. I am upset.
Also, among womben there is a variety. Why am I supposed to be clean shaven and squeezed through size 3 to be a "woman?" Because people who are used to free labor, sex and servile approach, would like for this to continue. Did you know that the schools might be implementing SEPARATE BUT EQUAL DOCTRINE ON EDUCATION? No, you chicks are too busy being out shopping or sucking dick. I do both, but I find time for them when all else is done. Shopping and sucking can't be a human life.
OR are you a "chick?" A baby bird of domestic decent waiting to be barely grown up to lay eggs or be prepared for consumption? Women act like a snail and crawl into their mental houses when men attcke, or hide their heads like that Australian bird, into the sand. They fight for nothing, stand for nothing, and protest nothing. Stupid, spoiled by stupidity, worst drug-addicts of illusion and self deceit, they are objects to be moved around and manipulated. And if you want to call me sexist, sure, but I have a right to not only what I think, but also have a right that humanity have won over centuries of its development to be listened to, understood and properly, reasonably argued with. And I have a right to agree or disagre. Fuck you and your mental manipulation, shit.
And don't forget to buy another Loui Vattan bag or something. And your lipstick is not red enough. And it's ok to have a guy tell you what to do and think for you - you did grow up with "Married with Children," "90210" and "Sesame Street."

AN IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

I finally came out to myself: I am so tired of pretending and playing the patriarchal game of feminine mystique and impregnable woman. Fuck it : here is the big news. I LOVE DICK. I LOVE TO FUCK AND I WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO UNDER VARIOUS CIRCUMSTANCES, IN MANY AND NY SITUATIONS, AS MUCH AS I CAN AS LONG AS I LIVE. I LOVE MEN AND I WANT TO FUCK THEM ALL. EACH AND EVERY SINGLE ONE UNLESS HE IS MARRIED OR HAS A GIRLFRIEND. I DON'T SEE A NEED TO FOREGO MY PRINCIPLES FOR ONE DICK ATTACHED TO A PUSSY, I"LL FIND ANOTHER ONE.
DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK DICK SWALLOW SUCK IT LICK IT STICK IT YES.
Now that we all know how much I love dick and how much I am a healthy person, we can move onto a long awaited "Unsafe New York: Part Thirteen."

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Unsafe New York: Part Twelve

FIXING THE CAR OR "DON'T GOT NO WATCH ON ME"
I got back from a coffee shop with a hot cup of coffee in my hand. Outside, by my entrance door there was an older Hispanic man fixing his car. This was at about 10:40am. I went up and started on my work. Later that day, I went dowstairs to check on the mail and just to walk around in the sun. The man was still there. This was about noon. The car was taken apart and prompted up by various devices. He was in the middle of working. I asked him what was wrong with the car. In a broken but comprehensive English he responded. He spoke better English than many American children. He named names that I didn't know, that are terms for the car pros, but generally managed to convey the idea to me very clearly. Seeing that I am not completely understanding, he explained that the part in the wheel was broken. And that the fixing place wanted a $150 for it. And they also told him to come back in two weeks. "Why I need that for?" he said, more to himself than to me. "I go, I look, I find the part from a guy, he give me 2 for a $100. Now I fix it and fix (he named the other part). I asked him: how long have you been out here? He shrugged and said, an hour?
The young boy who sat in the car at the driver's seat, has tried to flush his perfect smile at me. "How old are you?" I asked him. "19" he proudly responded. He smiled again and flexed his muscle. "Do you know how to fix the car?" I asked him. He looked at me in shock. He smiled again. He moved the wheel of the standing car with the movement from right to left. I was supposed to be impressed. I was. Especially after I found out that he did not even have a watch and had to ask an older gentleman for time, to let me know. "Don't got no watch" was an explanation, followed by "on me". I assumed that meant that he had a watch at home, well, that's a relief. But shouldn't he have had a CLOCK at home? And what is the purpose of the watch at home?
Our generation. Instant gratification. Does any one of you know that it takes time to get shit done? And each shit has a different amount requiring to get it done? Do you know that there are circumstances that come up that can complicate it? Are you prepared for them? Do you know that just because you "think" something should get done in a certain way, it may not correspond with the reality? Why do you emptily think on a subject you neither know nor understand? But what do you expect? What model of behavior is being used right now for younger people? A negative female image. Stupid, brainless and thoughtless. Patriachally approved to be useless and without any proper and real knowledge. Dreamland. La la land. The haven of ignorance.
The people today that pass the judgments on hard working and knowing people have neither the criteria nor the right to do so. These people have never worked, never had understood to work in a team (knowing team's mentality is not working with the team), never had any connection with the reality but are immersed into computer world and shopping reality. And women, who support this reality with their knowledge of "psychology" are simply simplistic, uneducated and unevolved people who have no expression and no self beyond and above what the patriarchy gives them. Or allows them. Or what they have created, collectively. And unfortunately judging good and hard working people with stupid psychology only ensures that these people will not be the ones who will evolve and run the world but ensures that low, mean, greedy and miniscule individuals will be doing that instead. Women, you are messing up the evolutionary potential, little whores on heels, in skirts and with make up. What ridiculous creatures. They are not women, they are creatures. And cowardly at that. There is a difference between people like me and people like them.
They had nothing but the consolation of their own dreams and blindness, these women who bequeath the sickening "psychology" to others. Here is a revelation to those who respect these psychological whores and mongers: if the abuser is stronger than you, you associate with him. That means that the abuser's dreams, goals and the world perception becomes your own. And so whose dreams, desires and ideas these weak women without any will are honing? Bad men's. Greedy men's. Evil men's. Men who have no spirituality nor truth nor knowledge nor reason and humanity.
Unfortunately for all of us, we all have to live in the world. And if the dominat point of view is the one of abuse of the weaker and forcing of one's will upon another, then this is the world we will live in. Observe the difference in treatment of women in Asian countries, notorious for their abuse of women, and Western countries, superior (factually) in their treatment of women. One proof of that is Asian women coming en masse to America. Why? If it is so good, so blessed in their countries of origin, why come here, to America? What for? It is imporant to look back and to reflect on the past, in order to learn from it, because otherwise, there is no progress. Another interesting fact is that Asian language group does not have philosophy as we know it. It has contemplation about life, clothed largely in the form of metaphors. Metaphors allow for an instinctive understanding of the nature of something but no precise understanding of the thing. It is only a linear, distinctly Western though that could allow people to grasp the subject. Relfection is only possible in the mind and relies on the mechanism of remembering. Of course, it is possible to remember something in feeling, but to evoke that memory some sort of conscious effort and mechanism will be required. And that, the conscious effort conducted is what makes conscious living possible. Since conscious effort creates the best results in mental field, mind is the best tool for the conscious effort. Mind tools are logic and reason, both rely on language, mathematics and sciences. Conscious analysis (reflection and process of thinking) require thought and language and create concepts. Concepts allow for a better handling and understanding of the world. The more precise the process, the more perfect is the product. The better the tool the better the creation. Asian language relies vastly on an intuition and feeling. Both intuition and feeling are processes and take place in the present time. They can be unconcsious -based on incoming information, a response. They could be conscious and rely on another stimulation and play off another. But one thing they cannot be. A conscious, non-relying on the outside sources of information activity. For something to be conscious, it has to be aware. For something to be aware it has to reflect. For something to reflect it has to stop doing something, turn around and look back. Something that is always "in the flow" is unable to reflect because it is ever in the flow and never stops and therefore, cannot reflect. In order for something to be more conscious, it has to become more aware. And for that it has to exit the field of "being in the moment", it has to stop being fluid, it has to stop the world and stop. And look. And reflect. And think. But Asian women are encouraged to be "in the flow" and Asian language loves the "moment" and the "present moment" state and is therefore deficient in relfection and understanding of a deeper kind. Whatever a person with an imprecise language understands, she or he understands that by a hunch. And a "hunch" understaning cannot be ascertained for the truthfullness of its nature. A good example would be irrational hates and dislikes such as racsim, nationalis, religious persecution, gender hatred -sexism, gender identity hatred - gender discrimination. Prejudice of all sorts relies of a "hunch" feeling. When asked to name a reason for their hate, people respond that they "feel like it." If this type of thinking was allowed to persevere, our world would still have slavery, non-voting women, and no transsexuals nor lesbian and gay. It would be a world of bound feet, bent in humilation before the male "master" knees, and beaten to death black slaves and burnt alive witches. And when you don't look back, you can't reflect and can't learn from your mistakes.
Whoever thinks and names, controls the world. Whoever reflects, able to become the self. Whoever controls the ability of others to reflect, will have no problems on his rise to power. And by encouraging the mental state of "being in the moment" and being "fluid" men encourage women to be passive, and therefore unable to resist their control and evil doing. Make up, skirts, heels and hair removal are all a way to create a pleasant and stimulating mental and emotional state for a man, so that HE could function better, and so that HE could rise to power. Needless to conclude that the one who washes the toiler bowl at a master's house is not the one to use it. The woman who polishes herself widely to present herself to a man, does not use her self nor her own resources. The only person who does that is man.
And therefore, women, you in your mind that has no tools of self-defence against an oncoming onslaught of information, get mentally and psychically raped all the time, are you are bound to be controlled by circumstances, others, whatever. And women thusly positioned to "experience" and to "feel" will side with those who are able to beat them the strongest, and is able to provide such an impulse of pain and terror, that all potential resistance that was breeding in the soul, would be electricuted. Ad as a result of a promotion of that system of thought and living, the women are weakened and are unable to conduct the function of a sorter out of the incoming information and are unable to select a male who would be good, kind and evolutionary. These people who are good, kind and evolutionary, do not provide a jolt of energy. They are not operating on that system. These are higher evolved life forms, operating on a differnt mode and women are so lowered and made into batteries, they are almost unable to yank themselves out of this system of evil and to rise above to meet these men!
While women side with the strongest - read, meannest, obnoxious, uneducated guy, it appears "normal" and "natural." The women who are unable to reflect or to think are lacking in a reasoning capacity and without a reasoning capacity education is unavailable. To appreciate an education and a taste one must first possess it herself, and have a differentiating and knowledgeable mind.
Women fiercely protect their cavemen. Being wired so intently to "feel" they cannot do otherwise. Women get emotional if he is "abused" (read treated properly in response to his behavior and is not allowed to walk all over other people), and then these "chicks" try to stretch out the logic and "draw comparisons" on most unlikely things. They pass these comparisons with such pride and such intensity, as if they really were making sense. Only one of the two possible options are possible: either they are really dumb or they have learnt to act and fake and lie and are by nature now not human but slithering creatures. Most possible. This is how most men like their women: non-human bionic robotic animalistic slaves. What is wrong with comparisons and logic of most women? Well, how can two things be compared where only 1% of the facts between the two,correspond? Most women splash around in a mush of undifferentiation and have no brains whatsoever. The lack of education and the promotion of outright imbecility and chaotic response perhaps adds to it as well. America does not like its people to practice reason.
But women. They try to play a game of accusations and yank things out of the contet. Their men support them because these women support the slave-making mentality and framework, and society, as we know it, hates smart and good people. It is because society is mostly slavish, uneducated and mentally lazy creature who responds well to the feeling and sound of the whip. Most people have been so abused and so disrespected, they are by now brainless zombies who desire only two things: some food, some shelter. These people live in conditions below physical, mental, psychological and spiritual poverty. And women are a product of the treatment that reduces people in society to simple animals, plus a lot more and a lot worse policy of behavior. Being weak and without access to many paygrounds where talents, mind, body and skills could develop, poor creatures fumble around with the being, in the dark, in the process knocking out the very concepts that sustain them, from under one another and eventually. The poor being who is still little and wants to come through to the truth to benefit all of us, is unable and is smothered in the dark, by accident.
In the world this fumbling in the dark looks like lies, deceit and outright denial, deep hatred of our kind and irrational pull towards the man who abuses and beats women, and inability to stand one's ground. The stupidity and the dumbness of the people who are bred for centuries to be attractions and not human beings (put make up, shave and weak skirts) is so deep, so irreconciable, it is sad and scary at teh same time. Yes, the truth be it that you cannot shave and wear make up, have skirts and speak men's language and be an equal. You are forced to accept the aforementioned rules of appearance and behavior, and the things that you are forced to accept are not only meant to lower you and keep you down producing the result that is bad for your body, mind, psyche, spirit and soul, but the very fact that you are forced to do things you did not choose is undermining to you psychologically: how can you be an equal and be forced? How can you be self-arising and not choose? How can you be you and not be you?
And so women splash around and fumble in the dark and become if not already, amoebas. Only reason makes one supreme. Only reason. This is what makes us human. If these people, these poor women were allowed to run the world, untrained and not healed from the abuse they've recieved over centuries, us and monkeys would be considered the same species. We do have, literally 99% of the same genes. This 1% of genetic difference would surely be overlooked, because if a woman can compare two things on relation of 1%, she will surely not begrudge 1% to someone so close to a 100%! She compares (and is able to!) someone who is liable and responsible by definition of their job to action of sorts, to someone who is not responsible for the action the responsible person is liable to conduct. When a person has suffered because of the person who was responsible for conduction of his job failing to do so due to negligence, a woman will not be able to see this simple relation of facts and a simple property of responsibility at its proper place, but will surely side with the one who "messed up" because he puts up an act, and gives off waves of fear and "feeling" that is so familiar to her and that she has learnt so much to "understand." So, based on a woman's criteria, what kind of people go up and progress? stupid, simple, evil and bad people. And what people end up last on line? Nice gys. Nice guys finish last- well, I don't think we should become assholes but I do think we should educate the women.
Yet again, do you women realize that just because you get emotional it doesn't mean you're right? Do you ever wonder why you don't have much power and reality why do you have to give up your positions and then later, pretend that you actually enjoy the choices someone else made for you?
Well, it's easy: you don't think.
You hate one another.
You are cowardly.
You are outright cowards.
You have no thought.
You have no reflection and no self reflection.
You have no self-control.
You have no judgment proper
You hate excellence in one another but support it in the one who used it against you. Are you sure you are not monkeys yourselves? You are either deficient and missing a large genetic part or you simply are so abused and given such a false persona that it is not viable in the world to think or act! Shed the falsity and embrace the truth.
Who are you, people?

Tuesday, October 17, 2006

Unsafe New York: Part Eleven

LOVE YOUR BODY DAY
I am back. Sadly. And the subject of the matter in lieu of the "Love your Body Day" is: womben's cowardice.
The big question is: why are we such cowards? Why do we give our positions so easily? Why do we shrink in, like oysters, and crawl deeper and deeper to our demise? We don't even need to think about being burried: we are burried already, in oblivion. Why do I say it: very simply. I am an active person. I go to many places and see many things. Women suppresing the rising woman. Telling each other things designed to keep them in place and to keep them from evolving. They will tell you to yield the way, to swallow the insult, to shut your mouth and to forego your rights. They teach each other cowardice and obedience, no, obeisance.
Serve, serve, serve.
They cripple in turn one another. Their spirit is crippled by cowardice. They truly hate anyone who dares to be better. Unbelievable people, they hate the eminent and instead of rejoicing in the opportunity to evolve, dread it and curse the one who attempts the "Shawashang redemption." Among many things that I see is an absolute, blatant ignoring of screaming injustices done to women. A panel of discussion may hold place for injustices on some minority group that got mocked, but the fact that a woman is afraid to claim her rights and settle for lack of physical violence, is overlooked, ignored, footballed around and explained away. A woman gets noticed because of her color, identity and ethnicity, but what does that have to do with her mind, her spirit, and her soul? How about her accomplishments? Ah, but it is very simple. Who do other women hate with impecable an impeccable denial of that person's humanity? - You all know the answer. Other women. Women would rather hand the key to the city to a man, they will look hopefully upon him imagining all the centuries of repeated history of abuse not to be there, but not to a talented, selfless and driven individual of the same gender. And you wonder why there are no power groups or clicks of women? The indentification with the deadly "woman" role is complete because of the corresponding actions: shavings, make-ups, dressing-up. These are constant additions to the female gender and without them a woman, frankly, simply does not exit. Who is she outside of a role imposed by someone of the opposite gender? Who is she without her make up and the role of a watch dog of a man, willing and ready to jump on any woman who potentially may threaten the aptriarch and his power holds? What chances does she stand, without personality, self, and identity? All she has depends on the male, all, including her own identity. How awful! How impossible! How much of slave, but slave not for 300 years, but for the span of entire human civilizations. Myths of free women remain what they are: myths. And try to live the myth out?
Other women will do anything possible to justify why they shave, pluck and make themselves up. They will scream with the foam at their mouth why the lie of who they are is not a lie and the moment you implore them to use reason to differentiate between the truth and the lie, and make distinctions, will call you some name that will serve as a whip or try to use a male weapon of whipping fear into you. They congregate around some male and males and make hen sounds to no end. They lay eggs. They click and cluck and chuckle and make noises. Their vision is small and limited, and fears are huge. Through continuous cultivation of negative traits and denial of cultivation of positive, they have become lowly, treacherous, plotting and cuniving creatures. Congradulations, the world, way to go into the future!